Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
political parties had failed to hold elections or bring Maoist rebels
to peace talks Maoist = Communist (supported by communists from China) Don't think it couldn't happen here in America. All that's needed is another terrorist attack on the scale of 9-11, maybe even bigger, and Americans would practically be BEGGING Bush to take all their freedoms, take all their liberty, as long as it would save them from the evil terrorists. The problem is that trading freedom for security is a bargain with the devil, metaphorically speaking-you lose your freedom yet are no safer. Benjamin Franklin realized this when he said that those who trade essential liberty for temporary safety get neither liberty nor safety. Americans seem to have forgotten that-they'd willingly trade the Constitution for a police state in order to be saved from Osama, yet the terrorists would still attack and the only thing free about the US would be its rhetoric about preserving freedom. Coming soon to a newspaper in your town: editorials about clean socks. When communist terrorists start shooting off your children, rape you wife, and torture your neighbor, YOU TO will be begging the government to "protect" you! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obviously, one thing the people of Nepal need right now is outside
news via shortwave. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/08/in...a/08nepal.html February 8, 2005 Nepal's King Cracks Down on Politics and News Media By AMY WALDMAN KATMANDU, Nepal, Feb. 7 - Instead of the usual spicy mix of current affairs and politics, the subject of Radio Sagarmatha's talk show on Saturday night was as bland as rice. In fact, the subject was rice: the differences, as explained by a scientist, between golden, wild and other varieties. That was the only topic the independent Nepali FM station felt safe to discuss. "Normally I don't do that kind of program," a 31-year-old journalist at the station said, laughing nervously as a soldier listened. When the soldier - one of six lounging around the station - moved off, the smile fell away. "Our hands are tied," the journalist said. Six days ago Nepal's king ended the country's 15-year experiment with democracy and took power for himself, imposing a state of emergency and suspending a host of civil liberties, including freedom of expression. Nepalis have been facing something between fear and a farce since then, adjusting to a combination of royal rule and martial law. Those in politics and the news media feel particularly under siege. In a televised address last Tuesday morning, King Gyanendra said he was taking power for three years because the country's fractious political parties had failed to hold elections or bring Maoist rebels to peace talks. As he spoke, phone lines and Internet connections were being cut, political and student leaders were being detained and soldiers were arriving at news organizations' offices to take on their new role as censors. Nepalis now have no freedom of assembly, expression or opinion; no right to information, property or privacy; and no protection from preventive detention. The government has banned any criticism of the king's action for six months, and any public comment that could affect the morale of the security agencies. [...] All of the community radio stations that sprang up in the 1990's are locked up, playing only music or discussing things like rice. The BBC's popular Nepali news service has been stopped, and Netra K. C., its reporter in the western city of Nepalganj, has been detained, according to human rights activists. Newspapers have been reduced to editorializing about safely banal subjects, like the weather or clean socks, or resorting to metaphor to make their case. [...] |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rice? Rice (white rice,that is) was one of our "secret weapons" in the
Vietnam War.We shipped millions of tons of white rice over there.White rice has all of the nutrients bleached out of it. cuhulin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Rubin wrote:
Obviously, one thing the people of Nepal need right now is outside news via shortwave. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/08/in...a/08nepal.html February 8, 2005 Nepal's King Cracks Down on Politics and News Media By AMY WALDMAN KATMANDU, Nepal, Feb. 7 - Instead of the usual spicy mix of current affairs and politics, the subject of Radio Sagarmatha's talk show on Saturday night was as bland as rice. In fact, the subject was rice: the differences, as explained by a scientist, between golden, wild and other varieties. That was the only topic the independent Nepali FM station felt safe to discuss. "Normally I don't do that kind of program," a 31-year-old journalist at the station said, laughing nervously as a soldier listened. When the soldier - one of six lounging around the station - moved off, the smile fell away. "Our hands are tied," the journalist said. Six days ago Nepal's king ended the country's 15-year experiment with democracy and took power for himself, imposing a state of emergency and suspending a host of civil liberties, including freedom of expression. Nepalis have been facing something between fear and a farce since then, adjusting to a combination of royal rule and martial law. Those in politics and the news media feel particularly under siege. In a televised address last Tuesday morning, King Gyanendra said he was taking power for three years because the country's fractious political parties had failed to hold elections or bring Maoist rebels to peace talks. As he spoke, phone lines and Internet connections were being cut, political and student leaders were being detained and soldiers were arriving at news organizations' offices to take on their new role as censors. Nepalis now have no freedom of assembly, expression or opinion; no right to information, property or privacy; and no protection from preventive detention. The government has banned any criticism of the king's action for six months, and any public comment that could affect the morale of the security agencies. [...] All of the community radio stations that sprang up in the 1990's are locked up, playing only music or discussing things like rice. The BBC's popular Nepali news service has been stopped, and Netra K. C., its reporter in the western city of Nepalganj, has been detained, according to human rights activists. Newspapers have been reduced to editorializing about safely banal subjects, like the weather or clean socks, or resorting to metaphor to make their case. [...] Don't think it couldn't happen here in America. All that's needed is another terrorist attack on the scale of 9-11, maybe even bigger, and Americans would practically be BEGGING Bush to take all their freedoms, take all their liberty, as long as it would save them from the evil terrorists. The problem is that trading freedom for security is a bargain with the devil, metaphorically speaking-you lose your freedom yet are no safer. Benjamin Franklin realized this when he said that those who trade essential liberty for temporary safety get neither liberty nor safety. Americans seem to have forgotten that-they'd willingly trade the Constitution for a police state in order to be saved from Osama, yet the terrorists would still attack and the only thing free about the US would be its rhetoric about preserving freedom. Coming soon to a newspaper in your town: editorials about clean socks. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "running dogg" wrote in message ... Joel Rubin wrote: Obviously, one thing the people of Nepal need right now is outside news via shortwave. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/08/in...a/08nepal.html February 8, 2005 Nepal's King Cracks Down on Politics and News Media By AMY WALDMAN KATMANDU, Nepal, Feb. 7 - Instead of the usual spicy mix of current affairs and politics, the subject of Radio Sagarmatha's talk show on Saturday night was as bland as rice. In fact, the subject was rice: the differences, as explained by a scientist, between golden, wild and other varieties. That was the only topic the independent Nepali FM station felt safe to discuss. "Normally I don't do that kind of program," a 31-year-old journalist at the station said, laughing nervously as a soldier listened. When the soldier - one of six lounging around the station - moved off, the smile fell away. "Our hands are tied," the journalist said. Six days ago Nepal's king ended the country's 15-year experiment with democracy and took power for himself, imposing a state of emergency and suspending a host of civil liberties, including freedom of expression. Nepalis have been facing something between fear and a farce since then, adjusting to a combination of royal rule and martial law. Those in politics and the news media feel particularly under siege. In a televised address last Tuesday morning, King Gyanendra said he was taking power for three years because the country's fractious political parties had failed to hold elections or bring Maoist rebels to peace talks. As he spoke, phone lines and Internet connections were being cut, political and student leaders were being detained and soldiers were arriving at news organizations' offices to take on their new role as censors. Nepalis now have no freedom of assembly, expression or opinion; no right to information, property or privacy; and no protection from preventive detention. The government has banned any criticism of the king's action for six months, and any public comment that could affect the morale of the security agencies. [...] All of the community radio stations that sprang up in the 1990's are locked up, playing only music or discussing things like rice. The BBC's popular Nepali news service has been stopped, and Netra K. C., its reporter in the western city of Nepalganj, has been detained, according to human rights activists. Newspapers have been reduced to editorializing about safely banal subjects, like the weather or clean socks, or resorting to metaphor to make their case. [...] Don't think it couldn't happen here in America. All that's needed is another terrorist attack on the scale of 9-11, maybe even bigger, and Americans would practically be BEGGING Bush to take all their freedoms, take all their liberty, as long as it would save them from the evil terrorists. The problem is that trading freedom for security is a bargain with the devil, metaphorically speaking-you lose your freedom yet are no safer. Benjamin Franklin realized this when he said that those who trade essential liberty for temporary safety get neither liberty nor safety. Americans seem to have forgotten that-they'd willingly trade the Constitution for a police state in order to be saved from Osama, yet the terrorists would still attack and the only thing free about the US would be its rhetoric about preserving freedom. Coming soon to a newspaper in your town: editorials about clean socks. Every time I read something like this, I'm reminded that we did do something like this already, and the country survived. Mr. Lincoln saw to that. --Mike L. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
running dogg wrote:
Just as long as I have an Uzi and enough ammo, I can protect myself. I suppose that a good number of Americans feel the same way, although admittedly fewer than there used to be. Hell, that's not enough to protect you from Janet Reno. -- In Memoriam: Julius the cat April 1, 1993 - February 3, 2005 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
ARRL bamboozled by FCC -- BPL Lives, big money talks | Homebrew | |||
ARRL bamboozled by FCC -- BPL Lives, big money talks | Homebrew | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment |