According to Kiwa's website, their shortwave preamp will make your
receiver quieter. They claim that when you turn off your receiver's
internal preamp and instead rely upon the Kiwa preamp, you will have
fewer noisy circuits operating inside the receiver.

I find myself unmoved by this claim, since it would apply to *any*
external preamp--and most external preamps will do nothing to improve
S/N ratio, at least in my (limited) experience.

Of course, the Kiwa preamp also has a BCB rejection filter. I *do* see
how this could improve S/N ratio, but I'd like to hear some first hand
reports.

If you've used Kiwa's preamp, can you comment on whether it resulted in
a significantly improved signal to noise ratio?

Thanks in advance,

Steve

wrote in message
oups.com...
According to Kiwa's website, their shortwave preamp will make your
receiver quieter. They claim that when you turn off your receiver's
internal preamp and instead rely upon the Kiwa preamp, you will have
fewer noisy circuits operating inside the receiver.

I find myself unmoved by this claim, since it would apply to *any*
external preamp--and most external preamps will do nothing to improve
S/N ratio, at least in my (limited) experience.

Of course, the Kiwa preamp also has a BCB rejection filter. I *do* see
how this could improve S/N ratio, but I'd like to hear some first hand
reports.

If you've used Kiwa's preamp, can you comment on whether it resulted in
a significantly improved signal to noise ratio?

Thanks in advance,

Steve
Why would a preamp not help s/n ratio? If it amplifies the signal along with
antenna noise, then there is less amplification to be done by the radio
itself and the stage noise in the radio will be reduced. It should improve
S/N ratio.
B

what is happening is that the noisy preamp in the receiver is being
REPLACED with a less noisy preamp from kiwa. therefor overall there is
less noise.

it is totally logical, Craig has made an "expensive" high quality
preamp to replace the low cost financially constrained consumer
pre-amp.

wrote in message
oups.com...
According to Kiwa's website, their shortwave preamp will make your
receiver quieter. They claim that when you turn off your receiver's
internal preamp and instead rely upon the Kiwa preamp, you will have
fewer noisy circuits operating inside the receiver.

I find myself unmoved by this claim, since it would apply to *any*
external preamp--and most external preamps will do nothing to improve
S/N ratio, at least in my (limited) experience.

Of course, the Kiwa preamp also has a BCB rejection filter. I *do* see
how this could improve S/N ratio, but I'd like to hear some first hand
reports.

If you've used Kiwa's preamp, can you comment on whether it resulted in
a significantly improved signal to noise ratio?

Thanks in advance,

Steve

Unless the noise figure of the Kiwa preamp is significantly better than the
NF of the one in the receiver, there will be no improvment in S/N- it's not
magic, it's math. At HF S/N is hardly a concern anyway as the noise floor is
not device limited but atmospherics limited. If you hear an increase in
noise on your receiver when you connect the antenna, you are already seeing
the limit.

Dale W4OP

I don't think I've *ever* connected an antenna to any receiver without
hearing an increase in noise. Is the goal of improving the S/N ratio
really that hopeless? I've heard great things about the Kiwa
preamp....it that all just hot air or does it really live up to its
claims? Are you guys speaking from experience with the Kiwa unit?

Steve

jimg wrote:

i don't thjink i've ever heard anything goofier. you cannot improve on
the s/s at the receiver input without altering the antenna. given a
reasonable impedance match from the receiver to the antenna, that's
it. and it's not hopeless, it's just what it is. if there were no
atmosphereic noise or propogation effects, swl would be kind boring.

as far as your receiver, most receivers noise floors are so far below
the antenna s/n that there is no improvemnt in your dxing capability
there...and why playing with your antenna can make such a diff.

btw, there are ways to improve the performance dramatically, but
wideband amps are not the answer..whereas very narrow band rf amps
are...especially if they're LN2 cooled along with the antenna
pre-amp...but then you don't have enough money for this scheme.

now the kiwa design like other LNA's is very basic and uses a shunt
feebback two transistor approach. other use cascoded mos devices
(called dual gate by non-engineers)..all are very low noise designs
and give moderate gain/ in the case of kiwa, you get 10dB gain and a
reasonable NF (noise figure) (p.s. your cell phone gets better) ...
but 10dB is practically nothing (you got a 10dB rf attenuator on your
rcvr?) and usually will not change an overall sinpo from 2 to 3.

20dB is better, but if noise at the antenna dominates, the snr remains
the same.

having an rf lab with about $2M of equip to play with, i built a nice
little preamp with built in programmable rlc bandpass filtering....and
even then there is little appreciable improvement (on an old r1000) on
"real" sigs buried in noise...

some mornings though, when the background noise is low, the preamp
boosts weak sigs to a more audible level. non-linear adaptive LMS
noise cancellation does the rest...

if you dont have an rf front end worth a damn, it might help...and a
bcb hp filter might too....but in general, you paid enuf money
for a more than adequate rf front end...the rest is the sunspot cycle,
your propogation conditions, your patience and tenacity...


jimg phdee


I don't think I've *ever* connected an antenna to any receiver without
hearing an increase in noise. Is the goal of improving the S/N ratio
really that hopeless? I've heard great things about the Kiwa
preamp....it that all just hot air or does it really live up to its
claims? Are you guys speaking from experience with the Kiwa unit?

Steve

jimg
Oregon
USA

The preamp can improve NF if it has enough takeover
gain..........................in most cases, this is not necessary. A much
better way to go is to have a 1st mixer that has a low conversion loss or
good NF in the first place. Any amount of RF amplification that you add
ahead of that mixer decreases the dynamic range by the same
amount.........for instance, if you add 10dB of gain ahead of the mixer,
your 1dB compression is degraded by 10dB, your IP3 is degraded by 10dB,
etc,etc,etc.
As an example, you can use a Mini-Circuits TAK-3H as your 1st mixer. The 1dB
compression point on this device is +14dBm and the IP3 of this mixer is
+28dBm. The tradeoff here is that +17dBm (50mW) of LO power is required to
properly "turn on" the diodes so that good dynamic range and conversion loss
figures are met. The SSB conversion loss on this device is right around
4.7dB. This is roughly, but not exactly equivalent to the NF. Add in 2dB of
loss for the input filter and you have a system NF of approximately 7dB.
This will allow you to hear a signal down to around .04uV. You do need to
have a good post mixer amplifier that follows the mixer, and a diplexer to
follow that mixer. Since the diplexer provides some selectivity, you will
not have noise at the image frequency degrading the system NF. It is not
expensive to employ this scheme; I don't know why manufacturers don't
generally do it. Exceptions are some of the solid state Collins equipment,
the Drake R7, TR7, R8. Some of the manufacturers use a quad JFET 1st mixer.
This mixer can have an IP3 of +30 to +40dBm. Examples that use this design
are the Kenwood TS-50, TR570, Racal 6790/GM, AOR-7030, Yaesu FT1000.
The big thing here is setting up the proper gain distribution in the system.
Whenever possible, keep all of the amplification AFTER the 1st mixer, and
you will be able to take advantage of the full dynamic range of the mixer.
I think that the Drake R8 has a NF of 10 to 12dB, as does the AOR-7030. For
receiving below 30MHz, this is fine, because in most areas, 15dB is the
amount of excess noise that you will encounter.
I hope this helps to explain why you don't need a preamp, unless you are in
an extremely quiet location such as northern Wisconsin, up in the ore
deposit regions, or out in the country where the excess noise is a bit
lower. When I was living out in the outskirst of Cedar Rapids, the area was
extremely quiet RF wise, so a super sensitive receiving system was helpful.
Now that I am back in the Chicago area there is so much noise that this type
of receiver isn't as necessary. The background noise from the thousands of
furnace controllers, factory equipment, etc, bring up the background noise
quite a bit.

Pete

"jimg" wrote in message
...
jimg wrote:

i don't thjink i've ever heard anything goofier. you cannot improve on
the s/s at the receiver input without altering the antenna. given a
reasonable impedance match from the receiver to the antenna, that's
it. and it's not hopeless, it's just what it is. if there were no
atmosphereic noise or propogation effects, swl would be kind boring.

as far as your receiver, most receivers noise floors are so far below
the antenna s/n that there is no improvemnt in your dxing capability
there...and why playing with your antenna can make such a diff.

btw, there are ways to improve the performance dramatically, but
wideband amps are not the answer..whereas very narrow band rf amps
are...especially if they're LN2 cooled along with the antenna
pre-amp...but then you don't have enough money for this scheme.

now the kiwa design like other LNA's is very basic and uses a shunt
feebback two transistor approach. other use cascoded mos devices
(called dual gate by non-engineers)..all are very low noise designs
and give moderate gain/ in the case of kiwa, you get 10dB gain and a
reasonable NF (noise figure) (p.s. your cell phone gets better) ...
but 10dB is practically nothing (you got a 10dB rf attenuator on your
rcvr?) and usually will not change an overall sinpo from 2 to 3.

20dB is better, but if noise at the antenna dominates, the snr remains
the same.

having an rf lab with about $2M of equip to play with, i built a nice
little preamp with built in programmable rlc bandpass filtering....and
even then there is little appreciable improvement (on an old r1000) on
"real" sigs buried in noise...

some mornings though, when the background noise is low, the preamp
boosts weak sigs to a more audible level. non-linear adaptive LMS
noise cancellation does the rest...

if you dont have an rf front end worth a damn, it might help...and a
bcb hp filter might too....but in general, you paid enuf money
for a more than adequate rf front end...the rest is the sunspot cycle,
your propogation conditions, your patience and tenacity...


jimg phdee


I don't think I've *ever* connected an antenna to any receiver without
hearing an increase in noise. Is the goal of improving the S/N ratio
really that hopeless? I've heard great things about the Kiwa
preamp....it that all just hot air or does it really live up to its
claims? Are you guys speaking from experience with the Kiwa unit?

Steve

jimg
Oregon
USA

here is how Craig (the designer) describes it:

The receiver's Noise Figure may be improved when using the SW Preamp,
especially if the receiver's preamp can be disengaged.

The SW Preamp has excellent signal overload immunity. It typically
measures 20 dB better than the average receiver. Third Order Intercept
or ICP3 is a measurement of signal overload characteristics. The SW
Preamp ICP3 measures +34 dBm. A typical table top receiver measures +4
to +10 dBm. The Drake R8A specifies an ICP3 of +10 dBm with the preamp
engaged.

The balanced input allows proper termination to balanced antennas such
as a two wire beverage antenna, or T2FD antennas. Kiwa will soon have a
phase switching control unit available for balanced beverage antennas.
This control unit would connect to the SW Preamp output and the
CT-Center Tap connection providing the ability to switch the receive
pattern of a two wire beverage antenna. (In one position the receive
pattern would be from one end, the other position would switch the
receive pattern to the other end.)

Reception below 1.8 MHz is possible when using a long-wire or beverage
antenna by connecting the receiver input to what is the 50 Ohm Input.
In this configuration the input transformer is acting as an impedance
matching device to the 50 Ohm Input and signals are passively coupled
to the receiver bypassing the BCB Filter and Preamp.

Price: $109.00

Claimes are claimes.Clamies don't mean **** unless you buy one of them
claimes and see/hear the proof of the pudding for yourelf.I can claime
any damn thing,but what does that mean? Step Right Up,Ladies and
Gentlemen,, this snake oil will cure evreything that ails ya! Only one
dollar a bottle!
cuhulin

I'm enjoying these posts about why the Kiwa preamp should / should not
be of much use to me, but it's a little surprising that not a single
soul from RRS has stepped forward to say "I tried the Kiwa preamp and
HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED...." I have less technical expertise than any of
you guys, so when you disagree with each other about the usefulness of
this device, I'm not in much of a position to conclude that one side's
right and the other's wrong (though I DO enjoy the posts, just the
same...maybe I'll learn something). However, if someone just said, "I
used this preamp and it did/did not work", this is a piece of
information I'd know how to 'digest'.

I will say, though, that the mere fact that there's no clear consensus
on whether the Kiwa would help with S/N makes me uninclined to put down
over a hundred bucks for it.

Steve