Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just got finished building one of these things. It is not quite stock. I
used film caps in the audio chain and the synthesizer loop filter, silver micas in the RF filters, a Murata CFR series filter in the I.F. strip, matched hot carrier diodes in the 2nd mixer, and 1N5767 PIN diodes instead of the stock attenuator diodes. At 15MHz, MDS is .06uV. No overloading was noted on any band, including 49 Meters. System gain is quite high. MW performance isn't too hot, but it could be the input filter. I might use a design of my own and see how it works out. I had seen this unit in the past, but I didn't want to pay 200 dollars for a kit..............this radio kit was part of a trade I made a couple of weeks ago. Knowing what I know now about this radio, I would say it is worth the kit price. Pete |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/02/2005 3:09 AM, Pete KE9OA wrote:
I just got finished building one of these things. It is not quite stock. I used film caps in the audio chain and the synthesizer loop filter, silver micas in the RF filters, a Murata CFR series filter in the I.F. strip, matched hot carrier diodes in the 2nd mixer, and 1N5767 PIN diodes instead of the stock attenuator diodes. At 15MHz, MDS is .06uV. No overloading was noted on any band, including 49 Meters. System gain is quite high. MW performance isn't too hot, but it could be the input filter. I might use a design of my own and see how it works out. I had seen this unit in the past, but I didn't want to pay 200 dollars for a kit..............this radio kit was part of a trade I made a couple of weeks ago. Knowing what I know now about this radio, I would say it is worth the kit Nice. Are you getting the birdies below 7MHz that some people think are caused by IF from the LED display? The AGC is reported to be a bit harsh on AM. Have you noticed this, or is it as bad as the report of eham.com suggests? I wonder if your tolerance tweaks in the IF stage helped in this regard. What kind of antenna do you have hooked up to this? I understand Ten-Tec advises using a long shielded hookup to the antenna. I might be tempted to replace the phono jack with BNC or coax to make this easier. Though, I suppose shielded cables meant for audio applications are a dime-a-dozen. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not yet..............I tried it with an outdoor antenna. Hooking it up to
the RF generator, though also poses no problems. I do notice one problem.........when you peak the 455kHz I.F. transformers that feed the 1350 I.F. amps, the NF suffers. I notice that the circuit, as designed, applies V+ to the high side of the primary instead of using the center tap. This connection is also bypassed to ground. I think that if I feed V+ to the center tap, that this problem should go away. I have used these devices in the past, with no problems, but I did feed V+ through the center tap of the primary. I also noticed the the PIN diodes in the front end are being biased at 20mA. PIN diodes should be biased at 75mA or so, for low "on" resistance. I am going to reduce that 220 ohm bias resistor to around 47 ohms and see what happens. I haven't measured the Q of the front end coils, but I would surmise that it isn't too high. I've got some magnetically shielded units with the same form factor that have a Q of 50. This should improve the front end filter loss. I did remove the 1k swamping resistor from the primary of the 1st 455kHz I.F. transformer. Gain came up quite a bit, so the radio sounds more like a 651S-1 or a 75A-4. I'll let you folks know how things turn out, once I finish with the radio. It really is a cool radio. Pete "clvrmnky" wrote in message ... On 25/02/2005 3:09 AM, Pete KE9OA wrote: I just got finished building one of these things. It is not quite stock. I used film caps in the audio chain and the synthesizer loop filter, silver micas in the RF filters, a Murata CFR series filter in the I.F. strip, matched hot carrier diodes in the 2nd mixer, and 1N5767 PIN diodes instead of the stock attenuator diodes. At 15MHz, MDS is .06uV. No overloading was noted on any band, including 49 Meters. System gain is quite high. MW performance isn't too hot, but it could be the input filter. I might use a design of my own and see how it works out. I had seen this unit in the past, but I didn't want to pay 200 dollars for a kit..............this radio kit was part of a trade I made a couple of weeks ago. Knowing what I know now about this radio, I would say it is worth the kit Nice. Are you getting the birdies below 7MHz that some people think are caused by IF from the LED display? The AGC is reported to be a bit harsh on AM. Have you noticed this, or is it as bad as the report of eham.com suggests? I wonder if your tolerance tweaks in the IF stage helped in this regard. What kind of antenna do you have hooked up to this? I understand Ten-Tec advises using a long shielded hookup to the antenna. I might be tempted to replace the phono jack with BNC or coax to make this easier. Though, I suppose shielded cables meant for audio applications are a dime-a-dozen. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete KE9OA wrote:
I did remove the 1k swamping resistor from the primary of the 1st 455kHz I.F. transformer. Gain came up quite a bit, so the radio sounds more like a 651S-1 or a 75A-4. Considering you're not getting any overloading on any band, why do you suppose they put it there in the first place? I can only think of reducing primary Q, which doesn't seem terribly worthwhile. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I figured that out earlier this evening...............It looks as if this
receiver has a single loop AGC system. This causes some problems, because of the high gain of the 1350s themselves. The I.F. gain is so high that AGC starts on signals as small as .1uV. This means that the PIN diode attenuator is active at very low signal levels; the result is a degraded NF as I.F. gain is increased. It appears that the designer's solution was to intentionally lower the system gain so that this wouldn't happen. That didn't cut it for me, so I delayed the RF AGC by inserting a series resistor between the PIN diode attenuator and the AGC control voltage source for the shunt diode. For the series PIN diode, I bumped up the current to 75mA, a much more realistic drive current for this type of device. The I.F. strip was not optimally designed, in that V+ was applied to the Pin2 of the 1350 (OK here), and Pin1 at the same time (not good), allowing the voltage to flow through the primary of the I.F. transformer to Pin8 (other pin of differntial output pair, also not good). What I did was break the V+ connection from Pin1 and rerouted this connection to the center tap of the I.F. transformer primary. This is good, because instead of having Pin1 of the 1350 I.F. amp at AC ground, the center tap of the transformer can now be grounded, providing a balanced load for the MC1350. This is how the chip was intended to be used, so this is also good. Now, when I peaked the I.F. transformers there was a definite peak instead of a very broad peak. This, in combination with the RF AGC loop changes and the removal of the high pass filter from the preselector gives the receiver a .05uV MDS over the whole tuning range. Because of the delayed AGC, the receiver I.F. strip clips at 15mV instead of 25mV. Once you tune the strong signal out of the I.F. bandpass, no overload is encountered. There was some crossmodulation from the series PIN diode, until I bumped up the diode current from 15mA to 75mA. A 1N5767 PIN diode is ok up to 100mA, so the higher current isn't an issue. Because of the very high AGC action, you cannot really align this receiver by ear. What you need to do is look at the AGC voltage at the output of the emitter follower with a VOM (analog meter), and then you have a nice signal strength meter for doing the alignment. I am very happy with this receiver; I will give the folks at Ten-Tec a call about my findings. Pete "clifto" wrote in message ... Pete KE9OA wrote: I did remove the 1k swamping resistor from the primary of the 1st 455kHz I.F. transformer. Gain came up quite a bit, so the radio sounds more like a 651S-1 or a 75A-4. Considering you're not getting any overloading on any band, why do you suppose they put it there in the first place? I can only think of reducing primary Q, which doesn't seem terribly worthwhile. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Pete KE9OA wrote: I figured that out earlier this evening...............It looks as if this receiver has a single loop AGC system. This causes some problems, because of the high gain of the 1350s themselves. The I.F. gain is so high that AGC starts on signals as small as .1uV. This means that the PIN diode attenuator is active at very low signal levels; the result is a degraded NF as I.F. gain is increased. It appears that the designer's solution was to intentionally lower the system gain so that this wouldn't happen. That didn't cut it for me, so I delayed the RF AGC by inserting a series resistor between the PIN diode attenuator and the AGC control voltage source for the shunt diode. For the series PIN diode, I bumped up the current to 75mA, a much more realistic drive current for this type of device. The I.F. strip was not optimally designed, in that V+ was applied to the Pin2 of the 1350 (OK here), and Pin1 at the same time (not good), allowing the voltage to flow through the primary of the I.F. transformer to Pin8 (other pin of differntial output pair, also not good). What I did was break the V+ connection from Pin1 and rerouted this connection to the center tap of the I.F. transformer primary. This is good, because instead of having Pin1 of the 1350 I.F. amp at AC ground, the center tap of the transformer can now be grounded, providing a balanced load for the MC1350. This is how the chip was intended to be used, so this is also good. Now, when I peaked the I.F. transformers there was a definite peak instead of a very broad peak. This, in combination with the RF AGC loop changes and the removal of the high pass filter from the preselector gives the receiver a .05uV MDS over the whole tuning range. Because of the delayed AGC, the receiver I.F. strip clips at 15mV instead of 25mV. Once you tune the strong signal out of the I.F. bandpass, no overload is encountered. There was some crossmodulation from the series PIN diode, until I bumped up the diode current from 15mA to 75mA. A 1N5767 PIN diode is ok up to 100mA, so the higher current isn't an issue. Because of the very high AGC action, you cannot really align this receiver by ear. What you need to do is look at the AGC voltage at the output of the emitter follower with a VOM (analog meter), and then you have a nice signal strength meter for doing the alignment. I am very happy with this receiver; I will give the folks at Ten-Tec a call about my findings. Pete "clifto" wrote in message ... Pete KE9OA wrote: I did remove the 1k swamping resistor from the primary of the 1st 455kHz I.F. transformer. Gain came up quite a bit, so the radio sounds more like a 651S-1 or a 75A-4. Considering you're not getting any overloading on any band, why do you suppose they put it there in the first place? I can only think of reducing primary Q, which doesn't seem terribly worthwhile. Hello Pete I just picked up a used 1254 and I would like to improve the performance. I read though this thread and I wonder if you could list your improvements and any more suggestions you might have? Thank you. Richard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave | |||
STATUS : Grundig Satellit 800 Millennium World Band Receiver | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Ten Tec 1254 HF receiver kit | Shortwave | |||
Ten Tec 1254 HF receiver kit | Shortwave |