Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Over the last day or so I've had a chance to experiment with one of the
old ClearSpeech base units. I've heard mixed opinions about the value of this unit when it comes to DXing weak signals. Some say it can make some signals intelligible when they otherwise wouldn't be, while others say that it can't. My own sense is that it can, *depending on the circumstances*. If the signal is just so weak that you couldn't make it out even under optimal circumstances, then the Clearspeech can do anything about that. However, if enough signal is there but you're unable to resolve it because it's awash in noise, *then* the Clearspeech *can* make it intelligible--by stripping away the noise. So, I think this unit has real value for DX purposes, except on those occasions when the band you're listening to is just very quiet to begin with. At all other times, I think the ClearSpeech unit can make a significant difference. It's very neat and works better than I expected. When using it earlier today, I had the best, cleanest audio I've ever had of Diego Garcia on 13254 khz. From a purely functional point of view, I prefer the base unit to the speaker version because I already have a speaker I like, and I've heard nothing especially good about the ClearSpeech speaker. The only advantage to the speaker unit, so far as I can tell, is that it's newer and has improved signal processing capabilities. I wish Heil had decided to pick up production of the base unit instead of the speaker version, but so it goes. Steve |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Over the last day or so I've had a chance to experiment with one of the old ClearSpeech base units. I've heard mixed opinions about the value of this unit when it comes to DXing weak signals. Some say it can make some signals intelligible when they otherwise wouldn't be, while others say that it can't. My own sense is that it can, *depending on the circumstances*. If the signal is just so weak that you couldn't make it out even under optimal circumstances, then the Clearspeech can do anything about that. However, if enough signal is there but you're unable to resolve it because it's awash in noise, *then* the Clearspeech *can* make it intelligible--by stripping away the noise. So, I think this unit has real value for DX purposes, except on those occasions when the band you're listening to is just very quiet to begin with. At all other times, I think the ClearSpeech unit can make a significant difference. It's very neat and works better than I expected. When using it earlier today, I had the best, cleanest audio I've ever had of Diego Garcia on 13254 khz. From a purely functional point of view, I prefer the base unit to the speaker version because I already have a speaker I like, and I've heard nothing especially good about the ClearSpeech speaker. The only advantage to the speaker unit, so far as I can tell, is that it's newer and has improved signal processing capabilities. I wish Heil had decided to pick up production of the base unit instead of the speaker version, but so it goes. Steve I'm glad you had some fun Steve. Can you bypass the Heil speaker and use your own?? Lucky |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm glad you had some fun Steve. Can you bypass the Heil speaker and use your own?? Lucky There may well be a way to bypass the speaker. I haven't spent any time with the speaker version, though, so maybe someone who has one can comment. Steve |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure all that needs to be done is to open the unit up and insert a
mini jack between the PC board and the driver and use an external speaker. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
FS: Motorola Mitrek and Maxar 80 Base Stations | Swap | |||
Just found a Sears Roadtalker 40 Base Unit | CB | |||
MINT Radio Shack TRC 457 base ssb unit | CB | |||
Base Closures | Shortwave |