Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. If you want to do serious DX'ing, I'd recommend the R-75. I also recommend the R-75 for any kind of utility or ham listening. The R-75 is not a bad receiver for program listening, but it is not ideal. The stock unmodified am sync is not effective. The disadvantage being the receiver doesn't give you the capability to minimize distortion due to signal fade. A simple and inexpensive and reversible mod can be done on the receiver to greatly improve that problem. The R8 has a sync detector that works well, but it does not do as much as the improved ssb selectable am sync on the R8b. The over all audio quality of an unmodified R-75 is not as good as the R8. The R8 series is well known for having great audio. Again, you can do a simple mod on the R-75 to spruce up the audio quality. I've used both the R8 and the R-75. I've found that the R-75s performance using ecss in ssb mode in combination with the Icom twin PBT made it the better receiver for dealing with very weak and messy signals. Using the same antenna set up, I also found the R-75 to be the more sensative radio in practic, regardless of how close the written performance specs are on both the the radiosradios. I'd choose the R-75 over the R8 any day for DX'ing or utility. I have a modified R-75 with both the Kiwa sync mod and the audio mod. I use it with an external speaker too. With those mods and en external speaker, I can honestly say that it is right up there now with the R8 for program listening. In short with just two simple mods and an external speaker the R-75, can do what the R8 can do, but the R8 cant do what the R-75 can do in the way of ssb DX'ing and utility. Michael |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Michael" wrote: "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. Snip No it depends on whether you know what you are doing. I'm fed up with people advising people new to the hobby that this is the radio to get. This is the wrong radio for them to get unless they have the aptitude for it. Unless you want to kill the hobby stop recommending this radio to newbies please. You can make exceptions for people that are technicians or engineers that have an understanding of what the radio can do or be modified to do or are inclined to modify it themselves. I keep seeing people new to hobby sell the R75 they picked up and leave the hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Michael" wrote: "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. Snip No it depends on whether you know what you are doing. I'm fed up with people advising people new to the hobby that this is the radio to get. This is the wrong radio for them to get unless they have the aptitude for it. Unless you want to kill the hobby stop recommending this radio to newbies please. You can make exceptions for people that are technicians or engineers that have an understanding of what the radio can do or be modified to do or are inclined to modify it themselves. I keep seeing people new to hobby sell the R75 they picked up and leave the hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California You dont need a PhD to operate an R-75. It is no more complicated to use the an R8. Where are you coming from ??? Michael |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message gy.com.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message odigy.co m.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .prodigy .co m.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. Snip No it depends on whether you know what you are doing. I'm fed up with people advising people new to the hobby that this is the radio to get. This is the wrong radio for them to get unless they have the aptitude for it. Unless you want to kill the hobby stop recommending this radio to newbies please. You can make exceptions for people that are technicians or engineers that have an understanding of what the radio can do or be modified to do or are inclined to modify it themselves. I keep seeing people new to hobby sell the R75 they picked up and leave the hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California You dont need a PhD to operate an R-75. It is no more complicated to use the an R8. Where are you coming from ??? Where am I coming from? I coming from seeing someone new to the hobby buy a R75 then decide the hobby is not for them and selling it. Then exit the hobby. That's were I'm coming from. Why would they leave the hobby over an R-75 and not leave over an R8 ??? If you can't figure that out me amount of explanation from me will help you. I see... Running for the cover of a little misdirection, huh ??? Look Mike, I said my piece and you are free to do the same. I'm not arguing about it on Usenet. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message gy.com.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message odigy.co m.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .prodigy .co m.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. Snip No it depends on whether you know what you are doing. I'm fed up with people advising people new to the hobby that this is the radio to get. This is the wrong radio for them to get unless they have the aptitude for it. Unless you want to kill the hobby stop recommending this radio to newbies please. You can make exceptions for people that are technicians or engineers that have an understanding of what the radio can do or be modified to do or are inclined to modify it themselves. I keep seeing people new to hobby sell the R75 they picked up and leave the hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California You dont need a PhD to operate an R-75. It is no more complicated to use the an R8. Where are you coming from ??? Where am I coming from? I coming from seeing someone new to the hobby buy a R75 then decide the hobby is not for them and selling it. Then exit the hobby. That's were I'm coming from. Why would they leave the hobby over an R-75 and not leave over an R8 ??? If you can't figure that out me amount of explanation from me will help you. I see... Running for the cover of a little misdirection, huh ??? Look Mike, I said my piece and you are free to do the same. I'm not arguing about it on Usenet. No argument here. Only discussions. I'm still trying to figure out why an R-75 would make some one quit swl. It isn't a hard receiver to use. I use one and I am by no means a broadcast engineer. Do you envision people who haven't had their first table top receiver as idiots and illiterates ??? If you can use a volume knob and an on/off switch you can use an R-75. In short, if you've used any portable out there, you can use an R-75. Perhaps I'm missing something. Can you give reasons for your statement regarding the R-75 being a reason to quit swl ??? Michael |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
In short with just two simple mods and an external speaker the R-75, can do what the R8 can do, but the R8 cant do what the R-75 can do in the way of ssb DX'ing and utility. Michael That's just not true. The R8 series has been a favorite of DXers' for years. There's a reason for that. -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message ... "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message m.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. Snip No it depends on whether you know what you are doing. I'm fed up with people advising people new to the hobby that this is the radio to get. This is the wrong radio for them to get unless they have the aptitude for it. Unless you want to kill the hobby stop recommending this radio to newbies please. You can make exceptions for people that are technicians or engineers that have an understanding of what the radio can do or be modified to do or are inclined to modify it themselves. I keep seeing people new to hobby sell the R75 they picked up and leave the hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California You dont need a PhD to operate an R-75. It is no more complicated to use the an R8. Where are you coming from ??? Where am I coming from? I coming from seeing someone new to the hobby buy a R75 then decide the hobby is not for them and selling it. Then exit the hobby. That's were I'm coming from. Why would they leave the hobby over an R-75 and not leave over an R8 ??? If you can't figure that out me amount of explanation from me will help you. I see... Running for the cover of a little misdirection, huh ??? Michael Mike save it. That guy is a pure moron and has the brains of a termite and the personality of a pencil. He doesn't know what he's talking and never will. Your totally wasting your time with him. Lucky |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message ... "Brian Denley" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: In short with just two simple mods and an external speaker the R-75, can do what the R8 can do, but the R8 cant do what the R-75 can do in the way of ssb DX'ing and utility. Michael That's just not true. The R8 series has been a favorite of DXers' for years. There's a reason for that. -- Yes, it is true. Indeed the R8 is a great receiver and very popular. Regardless, the R-75 is a more capable receiver for DX'ing and utility. The primary reasons for that: The R-75 uses two filters in series and the R-75 has twin PBT. I have used both receivers. The R-75 is a better DX'ing rig. I have no stock in ICOM or need to prove it is a better receiver. I'm just stating facts. Using ECSS in ssb, the R-75 is a prime DX'ing rig. Nothing against the R8. Michael I agree. Nothing for the price can beat it for SSB and Dxing. It's just that some people are so thick they can't operate it. Not that it's hard, they are just plain idiots. Lucky |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lucky wrote: "Michael" wrote in message ... "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message m.. . In article , "Michael" wrote: "jimg" wrote in message ... any opinions about which to buy for dx... a 1992 drake r8 or a 2004 icom r-75 w dsp but without kiwa mods. thnx jimg Oregon USA Depends on what kind of listening you want to do. Snip No it depends on whether you know what you are doing. I'm fed up with people advising people new to the hobby that this is the radio to get. This is the wrong radio for them to get unless they have the aptitude for it. Unless you want to kill the hobby stop recommending this radio to newbies please. You can make exceptions for people that are technicians or engineers that have an understanding of what the radio can do or be modified to do or are inclined to modify it themselves. I keep seeing people new to hobby sell the R75 they picked up and leave the hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California You dont need a PhD to operate an R-75. It is no more complicated to use the an R8. Where are you coming from ??? Where am I coming from? I coming from seeing someone new to the hobby buy a R75 then decide the hobby is not for them and selling it. Then exit the hobby. That's were I'm coming from. Why would they leave the hobby over an R-75 and not leave over an R8 ??? If you can't figure that out me amount of explanation from me will help you. I see... Running for the cover of a little misdirection, huh ??? Michael Mike save it. That guy is a pure moron and has the brains of a termite and the personality of a pencil. He doesn't know what he's talking and never will. Your totally wasting your time with him. I get the feeling that you are pure neophyte compared to Telemon... Keep tuning though, you'll get the hang of it. dxAce Michigan USA Lucky |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I'm curious: How good the R-75's sync is after the Kiwa mod? Is it comparable to the sync on an R8B or one of the Lowe receivers? The Kiwa sync' mod' makes the R75 sync' comparable to that on the original R8 but not the R8B. The latter is how a really good sync' detector should work. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Used Drake R8 or New Icom R-75? | Shortwave | |||
Drake R8B side by side with an Icom 756 PRO III | Shortwave | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave | |||
FOR SALE KENWOOD DRAKE ICOM JPS | Swap | |||
stuff for sell kenwood drake icom JPS | Equipment |