Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
About a month ago I posted a question asking if others had
experienced local FM station interference at various frequencies on the FRG-100. I finally found the cause and a solution. The FM gets into the receiver thru the 12V power cable and any other connections to the receiver (external spkr, tape recorder or computer connection, etc.) IT DOES NOT ENTER THRU THE ANTENNA; in fact, you can ground the antenna terminals and it's still there! The FM signal mixes with the 2nd harmonic of the first local oscillator for some reason, and this allows either the sum or difference signals of the oscillator's 2nd harmonic and the FM freq. to fall at various frequencies from 1 to 30 MHz. My worst were on about 5.06 and 13.1 MHz and this computed out exactly to two of the local 100 kW FM station frequencies. The FIX: I was tired of that oddball FRG-100 power connector and the inability to use a standard 5mm coaxial power connector (common for most receivers)with the radio on camping DXpeditions so I purchased one of the standard types from Radio Shack (#274-1582), drilled an appropriate hole and mounted it just to the left of the existing connector in the blank spot on the back panel. I then soldered a small powdered iron torodial filter of about 10 uH between the connector's + pin and the top edge of the rear fuse holder (remove fuse first!) I then a soldered a 0.1 uf ceramic capacitor to either side of the toroid and the other side of the caps to chassis ground forming a pi filter. I then changed the plug on the power supply 12V cable to the standard 5mm male coaxial mating plug. The FM "intermod" is now less than S-2 to S-3 with no external antenna as long as I don't connect anything else to the accessory jacks on the receiver's rear panel. Once the antenna is connected, atmospheric noise or any signal that activates the AGC wipes it out. I hope this helps some of you that may have this problem. I think the direct ground connection to the chassis helps the most. The oddball stock connector connects the power ground to the pc board ground plane very close to the first mixer. This is probably the cause of the problem due to common mode ground loop problems in the 100 MHz range. Frank K3YAZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A McIntosh MR78 can handle that kind of environment. One of the tests that
McIntosh used to do was to inject a 12V interfering signal at a 10MHz offset to make sure that it didn't cause an increase in distortion at the frequency of the desired signal. It works very well in the Chicago area. A Luxman T-110 was also good, as was a Nakamichi Model 430 tuner. There are several good FM tuners on the market, including the Onkyo units that do the trick. The early Magnum Dynalab FM tuners that had the discrete front ends were also pretty good, but some of the models are using one of the Philips auto radio chipsets, including the RF/Mixer section. Whereas the FRG100 had those images breaking through on some of the MW frequencies in my area, the AOR7030 didn't exhibit that characteristic. The Lowe HF-150 doesn't have this problem either; nor does the Palstar R30. The latter three units do have a 45MHz 1st I.F. Nice work, Frank. Pete "Stephan Grossklass" wrote in message ... schrieb: Believe me this problem drove me crazy for a while. My QTH is essentially "bathed" in the FM rf from 3 100 kW FM towers that are within a 6 mile radius and line of sight with the house. This problem seems to only occur in receivers with a 45MHz 1st IF. Which would make images from +90 MHz possible, putting you straight into FMBCB. Signals would only need to find a way around the 30 MHz lowpass filtering, and there you have it. Your signal levels seem to uncover the limits of the PCB layout and grounding, pretty hardcore if you ask me. It would be interesting to know how a '7030 behaves in that kind of environment. BTW, what kind of FM tuner can handle that kind of "bath"? It would take at least something along the lines of an Onkyo T-4700, I assume. Stephan -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ PC#6: i440BX, 2xP3-500E, 704 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My FM receivers seem to be OK although one of the stations has an image
due to the signal strength. Both the Palstar R30 and HF-150 that I had in the past had the same FM pickup problem but it was no where near as bad as the FRG-100 and it was only on a couple of frequencies if I remember correctly. The interference could only be detected when the antenna was disconnected and one manually scanned the bands. By using the additional connector on the I put on the FRG's back panel along with some toroidal filters on the 12V power cable I've reduced it to a tolerable level that only seems to be present if the antenna is disconnected. I also added a few additional toroids at equal places on the power cable and that helped even more because they apparently broke the cable into smaller effective electrical lengths instead of the full physical length, which is, by the way a half-wavelength in the lower part of the FM band. Frank Pete KE9OA wrote: A McIntosh MR78 can handle that kind of environment. One of the tests that McIntosh used to do was to inject a 12V interfering signal at a 10MHz offset to make sure that it didn't cause an increase in distortion at the frequency of the desired signal. It works very well in the Chicago area. A Luxman T-110 was also good, as was a Nakamichi Model 430 tuner. There are several good FM tuners on the market, including the Onkyo units that do the trick. The early Magnum Dynalab FM tuners that had the discrete front ends were also pretty good, but some of the models are using one of the Philips auto radio chipsets, including the RF/Mixer section. Whereas the FRG100 had those images breaking through on some of the MW frequencies in my area, the AOR7030 didn't exhibit that characteristic. The Lowe HF-150 doesn't have this problem either; nor does the Palstar R30. The latter three units do have a 45MHz 1st I.F. Nice work, Frank. Pete "Stephan Grossklass" wrote in message ... schrieb: Believe me this problem drove me crazy for a while. My QTH is essentially "bathed" in the FM rf from 3 100 kW FM towers that are within a 6 mile radius and line of sight with the house. This problem seems to only occur in receivers with a 45MHz 1st IF. Which would make images from +90 MHz possible, putting you straight into FMBCB. Signals would only need to find a way around the 30 MHz lowpass filtering, and there you have it. Your signal levels seem to uncover the limits of the PCB layout and grounding, pretty hardcore if you ask me. It would be interesting to know how a '7030 behaves in that kind of environment. BTW, what kind of FM tuner can handle that kind of "bath"? It would take at least something along the lines of an Onkyo T-4700, I assume. Stephan -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ PC#6: i440BX, 2xP3-500E, 704 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's good...........it sounds like you are really in a strong signal area.
Up here at our new location, things are pretty good. I think that the worst area in Illinois in in the Barrington area. WBBM, WMAQ, and WGN are so strong that external mixing spur occur in rusty rain gutters, etc. I realize that these are MW frequencies we are talking about vs. the FM band image responses that you are dealing with. As you get higher in frequencies, those gremlins can become harder to tame. I've still yet to do your audio mod to my FRG100................too many receivers. I might be picking up a McKay-Dymek DR-33. It depends when my friend gets bored with it. Pete wrote in message oups.com... My FM receivers seem to be OK although one of the stations has an image due to the signal strength. Both the Palstar R30 and HF-150 that I had in the past had the same FM pickup problem but it was no where near as bad as the FRG-100 and it was only on a couple of frequencies if I remember correctly. The interference could only be detected when the antenna was disconnected and one manually scanned the bands. By using the additional connector on the I put on the FRG's back panel along with some toroidal filters on the 12V power cable I've reduced it to a tolerable level that only seems to be present if the antenna is disconnected. I also added a few additional toroids at equal places on the power cable and that helped even more because they apparently broke the cable into smaller effective electrical lengths instead of the full physical length, which is, by the way a half-wavelength in the lower part of the FM band. Frank Pete KE9OA wrote: A McIntosh MR78 can handle that kind of environment. One of the tests that McIntosh used to do was to inject a 12V interfering signal at a 10MHz offset to make sure that it didn't cause an increase in distortion at the frequency of the desired signal. It works very well in the Chicago area. A Luxman T-110 was also good, as was a Nakamichi Model 430 tuner. There are several good FM tuners on the market, including the Onkyo units that do the trick. The early Magnum Dynalab FM tuners that had the discrete front ends were also pretty good, but some of the models are using one of the Philips auto radio chipsets, including the RF/Mixer section. Whereas the FRG100 had those images breaking through on some of the MW frequencies in my area, the AOR7030 didn't exhibit that characteristic. The Lowe HF-150 doesn't have this problem either; nor does the Palstar R30. The latter three units do have a 45MHz 1st I.F. Nice work, Frank. Pete "Stephan Grossklass" wrote in message ... schrieb: Believe me this problem drove me crazy for a while. My QTH is essentially "bathed" in the FM rf from 3 100 kW FM towers that are within a 6 mile radius and line of sight with the house. This problem seems to only occur in receivers with a 45MHz 1st IF. Which would make images from +90 MHz possible, putting you straight into FMBCB. Signals would only need to find a way around the 30 MHz lowpass filtering, and there you have it. Your signal levels seem to uncover the limits of the PCB layout and grounding, pretty hardcore if you ask me. It would be interesting to know how a '7030 behaves in that kind of environment. BTW, what kind of FM tuner can handle that kind of "bath"? It would take at least something along the lines of an Onkyo T-4700, I assume. Stephan -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ PC#6: i440BX, 2xP3-500E, 704 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete - I just had to respond to your comment about the FRG-100 audio
mod. This is the 3rd FRG-100 I've had and it does not have the typical "muddy" audio and it appears to be totally stock inside. I didn't even do the mod because it sounds fine as it is. I did change the AM wiiiiide filter to a more narrow one with better skirts and so far, other than the input connector mod that's all I've "butchered" on this 100. BTW, I have an older Icom R-72 that I acquired off of Ebay and it's an excellent receiver in my estimation. No FM problems at all. Only drawback is they forgot to vent the cabinet! Frank K3YAZ Tucson (where desert wildflowers are everywhere now!) Pete KE9OA wrote: That's good...........it sounds like you are really in a strong signal area. Up here at our new location, things are pretty good. I think that the worst area in Illinois in in the Barrington area. WBBM, WMAQ, and WGN are so strong that external mixing spur occur in rusty rain gutters, etc. I realize that these are MW frequencies we are talking about vs. the FM band image responses that you are dealing with. As you get higher in frequencies, those gremlins can become harder to tame. I've still yet to do your audio mod to my FRG100................too many receivers. I might be picking up a McKay-Dymek DR-33. It depends when my friend gets bored with it. Pete wrote in message oups.com... My FM receivers seem to be OK although one of the stations has an image due to the signal strength. Both the Palstar R30 and HF-150 that I had in the past had the same FM pickup problem but it was no where near as bad as the FRG-100 and it was only on a couple of frequencies if I remember correctly. The interference could only be detected when the antenna was disconnected and one manually scanned the bands. By using the additional connector on the I put on the FRG's back panel along with some toroidal filters on the 12V power cable I've reduced it to a tolerable level that only seems to be present if the antenna is disconnected. I also added a few additional toroids at equal places on the power cable and that helped even more because they apparently broke the cable into smaller effective electrical lengths instead of the full physical length, which is, by the way a half-wavelength in the lower part of the FM band. Frank Pete KE9OA wrote: A McIntosh MR78 can handle that kind of environment. One of the tests that McIntosh used to do was to inject a 12V interfering signal at a 10MHz offset to make sure that it didn't cause an increase in distortion at the frequency of the desired signal. It works very well in the Chicago area. A Luxman T-110 was also good, as was a Nakamichi Model 430 tuner. There are several good FM tuners on the market, including the Onkyo units that do the trick. The early Magnum Dynalab FM tuners that had the discrete front ends were also pretty good, but some of the models are using one of the Philips auto radio chipsets, including the RF/Mixer section. Whereas the FRG100 had those images breaking through on some of the MW frequencies in my area, the AOR7030 didn't exhibit that characteristic. The Lowe HF-150 doesn't have this problem either; nor does the Palstar R30. The latter three units do have a 45MHz 1st I.F. Nice work, Frank. Pete "Stephan Grossklass" wrote in message ... schrieb: Believe me this problem drove me crazy for a while. My QTH is essentially "bathed" in the FM rf from 3 100 kW FM towers that are within a 6 mile radius and line of sight with the house. This problem seems to only occur in receivers with a 45MHz 1st IF. Which would make images from +90 MHz possible, putting you straight into FMBCB. Signals would only need to find a way around the 30 MHz lowpass filtering, and there you have it. Your signal levels seem to uncover the limits of the PCB layout and grounding, pretty hardcore if you ask me. It would be interesting to know how a '7030 behaves in that kind of environment. BTW, what kind of FM tuner can handle that kind of "bath"? It would take at least something along the lines of an Onkyo T-4700, I assume. Stephan -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ PC#6: i440BX, 2xP3-500E, 704 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Frank,
Mine seemed ok, too. I've got about a 1999 FRG-100B. About that R-72............maybe the intentionally designed the radio that way, so it could keep your house warm on those cool desert nights! Just kidding!!!! Pete wrote in message oups.com... Pete - I just had to respond to your comment about the FRG-100 audio mod. This is the 3rd FRG-100 I've had and it does not have the typical "muddy" audio and it appears to be totally stock inside. I didn't even do the mod because it sounds fine as it is. I did change the AM wiiiiide filter to a more narrow one with better skirts and so far, other than the input connector mod that's all I've "butchered" on this 100. BTW, I have an older Icom R-72 that I acquired off of Ebay and it's an excellent receiver in my estimation. No FM problems at all. Only drawback is they forgot to vent the cabinet! Frank K3YAZ Tucson (where desert wildflowers are everywhere now!) Pete KE9OA wrote: That's good...........it sounds like you are really in a strong signal area. Up here at our new location, things are pretty good. I think that the worst area in Illinois in in the Barrington area. WBBM, WMAQ, and WGN are so strong that external mixing spur occur in rusty rain gutters, etc. I realize that these are MW frequencies we are talking about vs. the FM band image responses that you are dealing with. As you get higher in frequencies, those gremlins can become harder to tame. I've still yet to do your audio mod to my FRG100................too many receivers. I might be picking up a McKay-Dymek DR-33. It depends when my friend gets bored with it. Pete wrote in message oups.com... My FM receivers seem to be OK although one of the stations has an image due to the signal strength. Both the Palstar R30 and HF-150 that I had in the past had the same FM pickup problem but it was no where near as bad as the FRG-100 and it was only on a couple of frequencies if I remember correctly. The interference could only be detected when the antenna was disconnected and one manually scanned the bands. By using the additional connector on the I put on the FRG's back panel along with some toroidal filters on the 12V power cable I've reduced it to a tolerable level that only seems to be present if the antenna is disconnected. I also added a few additional toroids at equal places on the power cable and that helped even more because they apparently broke the cable into smaller effective electrical lengths instead of the full physical length, which is, by the way a half-wavelength in the lower part of the FM band. Frank Pete KE9OA wrote: A McIntosh MR78 can handle that kind of environment. One of the tests that McIntosh used to do was to inject a 12V interfering signal at a 10MHz offset to make sure that it didn't cause an increase in distortion at the frequency of the desired signal. It works very well in the Chicago area. A Luxman T-110 was also good, as was a Nakamichi Model 430 tuner. There are several good FM tuners on the market, including the Onkyo units that do the trick. The early Magnum Dynalab FM tuners that had the discrete front ends were also pretty good, but some of the models are using one of the Philips auto radio chipsets, including the RF/Mixer section. Whereas the FRG100 had those images breaking through on some of the MW frequencies in my area, the AOR7030 didn't exhibit that characteristic. The Lowe HF-150 doesn't have this problem either; nor does the Palstar R30. The latter three units do have a 45MHz 1st I.F. Nice work, Frank. Pete "Stephan Grossklass" wrote in message ... schrieb: Believe me this problem drove me crazy for a while. My QTH is essentially "bathed" in the FM rf from 3 100 kW FM towers that are within a 6 mile radius and line of sight with the house. This problem seems to only occur in receivers with a 45MHz 1st IF. Which would make images from +90 MHz possible, putting you straight into FMBCB. Signals would only need to find a way around the 30 MHz lowpass filtering, and there you have it. Your signal levels seem to uncover the limits of the PCB layout and grounding, pretty hardcore if you ask me. It would be interesting to know how a '7030 behaves in that kind of environment. BTW, what kind of FM tuner can handle that kind of "bath"? It would take at least something along the lines of an Onkyo T-4700, I assume. Stephan -- Home: http://stephan.win31.de/ PC#6: i440BX, 2xP3-500E, 704 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT EMI problem with stove and internet connection | Homebrew | |||
RFI Problem With Lamp | Homebrew | |||
Long wire vs. G5RV/dipole | Shortwave | |||
Long Wire or Long Dipole | Shortwave | |||
Long Wire Antenna Question | Shortwave |