Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to thank those who responded to my question regarding
radio origins in the US. To the people calling me lazy for not doing my own research, you may be interested to know this paper was written in two parts. One was discussing the topic of the question. The other was analyzing the validity of human resources in groups like this one (Google) and other resources such as Allexperts.com on the internet. I don't blame the people calling me an imbecile and lazy, when all I needed to do was a Google search. Please understand part of my research was evaluating your responses. Thank you very much for your help, and I apologize for misleading you in any way. The information from those who answered was certainly used and greatly appreciated. Thanks again. Sincerely, Benji Mallicoat |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well I could have saved you a lot of analysis.
Here you will find opinions. Only a few take the time to quote a recognized authority. Or even know who the recognized authorities are. An opinion is a belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge. Translated - people quote some fuzzy recollections, what a friend thinks, what grandpa said, and frequently make things up. Even books are frequently wrong or presumptive. Your real answer should have been from recognized authorities and their aren't any here. Bottom line -- Caveat Lector wrote in message ups.com... I would like to thank those who responded to my question regarding radio origins in the US. To the people calling me lazy for not doing my own research, you may be interested to know this paper was written in two parts. One was discussing the topic of the question. The other was analyzing the validity of human resources in groups like this one (Google) and other resources such as Allexperts.com on the internet. I don't blame the people calling me an imbecile and lazy, when all I needed to do was a Google search. Please understand part of my research was evaluating your responses. Thank you very much for your help, and I apologize for misleading you in any way. The information from those who answered was certainly used and greatly appreciated. Thanks again. Sincerely, Benji Mallicoat |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boy, it breaks my heart that a few of the folks in this group called
you lazy. You were essentially using the people in this group as guinea pigs while conveniently failing to inform them of this fact--until of course your rinky-dink "experiment" was over. This kind of deceptive behavior really stinks, and it doesn't stink less if you say "Thanks" or "I'm sorry" after the fact. Steve |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 September 24, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-NOV-03) | Shortwave |