Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big deal.....yawn....
HDD DVD is nothing new. The broadcasters have nothing to worry about as millions and millions of viewers will still tune in and watch the commercials. Your could change the date of this story to 1980 and replace HDD-DVD with VCR and you'd have the same load of baloney. $500 million to has-been Howard is retarded though. I wonder if they did this to keep XM from swallowing them up. Sounds like a "poison pill" strategy. wrote in message ... by Mike Rogers.(Mike Rogers in Tokio) www.lewrockwell.com/rogers/rogers134.html I don't read that damn lib lew rockwell site,but I saw this article at another site that linked it to that damn lib lew rockwell site.The aricle does concern Shortwave Radio (Hey,I am always on topic,y'all just know) and other forms of electronic video and audio too.Soon as this Key Largo movie on tb is over,I am going to cut the light and get my beauty sleep.I have to watch Edward G. Robinson and Humphrey Bogart have that big shootout on that boat. cuhulin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian - KB9BVN wrote:
Big deal.....yawn.... HDD DVD is nothing new. The broadcasters have nothing to worry about as millions and millions of viewers will still tune in and watch the commercials. Your could change the date of this story to 1980 and replace HDD-DVD with VCR and you'd have the same load of baloney. $500 million to has-been Howard is retarded though. I wonder if they did this to keep XM from swallowing them up. Sounds like a "poison pill" strategy. It made up my mind. I won't subscribe to a service that will pay an outrageous price for something I wouldn't listen to for free. -- Former professional electron wrangler. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:15:48 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: Brian - KB9BVN wrote: Big deal.....yawn.... HDD DVD is nothing new. The broadcasters have nothing to worry about as millions and millions of viewers will still tune in and watch the commercials. Your could change the date of this story to 1980 and replace HDD-DVD with VCR and you'd have the same load of baloney. $500 million to has-been Howard is retarded though. I wonder if they did this to keep XM from swallowing them up. Sounds like a "poison pill" strategy. It made up my mind. I won't subscribe to a service that will pay an outrageous price for something I wouldn't listen to for free. You sound like my Dad, about 5 years before he got cable TV. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been getting Philip Swann's www.tvpredictions.com email
newsletters for about five years or more and his Swanni Sez email newsletters too.So the article wasen't news to me at all.I only posted it here because I thought somebody might be interested in reading it.I never watch Howard Stern or listen to him either or any of those other crappy programs on tv or radio.lib means libertarian,if y'all haven't figured that out yet. cuhulin |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:10:27 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: David wrote: You sound like my Dad, about 5 years before he got cable TV. So I'm supposed to pay for something I won't use? The only thing I would ever listen to on Sirius is WSM and I am listening to it right now on the computer. I spent what Sirius would cost along with a second phone line and dial up internet to get broadband internet and basic cable service for the same price. I only spend a couple hours a month in my truck and a few more at the grocery store or doctor's office. Please explain the logic of your statement. You need to spend more time listening to the radio. It'll improve your disposition. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:10:27 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: David wrote: You sound like my Dad, about 5 years before he got cable TV. So I'm supposed to pay for something I won't use? The only thing I would ever listen to on Sirius is WSM and I am listening to it right now on the computer. I spent what Sirius would cost along with a second phone line and dial up internet to get broadband internet and basic cable service for the same price. I only spend a couple hours a month in my truck and a few more at the grocery store or doctor's office. Please explain the logic of your statement. You need to spend more time listening to the radio. It'll improve your disposition. Actually, I enjoy building and repairing the radios more then listening to them these days. I have severe tinitus so I have to have the volume quite high to listen to fading signals. I loved to sit up all night and listen to international broadcast when i was a teenager, but that was a long time ago. Still, you haven't explained why I should subscribe to a service I don't need, or want. I looked at both XM and Sirius and I wasn't impressed by either. As far as Satellite radio, I built a C-band satellite system 15 years ago to listen to the radio stations carried a SCPC or subcarrier on the TV satellites. Have you ever built a radio and had the joy of hearing that first far away signal? How about the pure satisfaction of building a commercial station and transmitting the first signal? Or have you only opened a box and turned on someone else's idea of a radio? In other words, there is nothing wrong with my disposition, just that you want me to do things your way and it just won't happen. As far as new technology? I've worked on and built commercial radios you'll probably never see. Some of them will be used to track the recently announced space probe to Pluto. I learned to solder at eight when I built my first radio kit. I was hooked. At 13 I was working part time in a radio and TV shop repairing radios to make money to buy tools to build more radios. -- Former professional electron wrangler. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDK wrote:
It made me decide to get Sirius, as I actually liked XM better. I would pay 13 bucks a month for a decent signal of Howard alone! BDK Enjoy it. I didn't find anything on XM or Sirius that i wanted to hear that I can't already hear, here. -- Former professional electron wrangler. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
BDK wrote: It made me decide to get Sirius, as I actually liked XM better. I would pay 13 bucks a month for a decent signal of Howard alone! BDK Enjoy it. I didn't find anything on XM or Sirius that i wanted to hear that I can't already hear, here. Ten channels of every concievable genre of rap music, ten channels ditto of alt rock, and so on (including talk, everything from Nazi to anarchist)! There is such a thing as too much choice, IMO. I looked at a Sirius playlist when I was in Radio Shack (I only went in because my car was getting an oil change at the Goodyear down the street) and I was quite underwhelmed. Satellite radio's sole redeeming feature seems to be that it will tell you on the screen the artist and title of the song being played. 120 channels and every one of them have junk, just like satellite TV. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stern Proclaims the "Death of FM Radio" | Broadcasting | |||
Howard Stern jumps to Sirius, helps satellite radio | Broadcasting | |||
"Howard Stern and SIRIUS Announce the Most Important Deal in Radio History." | Shortwave |