That's not what your previous messages indicate.

Steve

wrote:

That's not what your previous messages indicate.

He can't keep things straight. Didn't he say just a while back that he had to
repair his antenna?

I may be wrong, but I do seem to recall that.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Yes, that's why he was resorting to satellite radio.

Steve

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:05:38 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

That's not what your previous messages indicate.

He can't keep things straight. Didn't he say just a while back that he had to
repair his antenna?

I may be wrong, but I do seem to recall that.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You also recall me saying ''meterhertz'' which I never said. Must be
fun, having a little world all to yourself.

On 22 Apr 2005 14:48:03 -0700, wrote:

Yes, that's why he was resorting to satellite radio.

Steve

I ''resort'' to satellite radio now for the same reaon I started
listening to HFBC 30 years ago; content. Lots and lots of content.

Now I still enjoy fishing on HF, but it's catch and release. For my
listening enjoyment I prefer something with a lot less static.

David wrote:

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:05:38 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

That's not what your previous messages indicate.

He can't keep things straight. Didn't he say just a while back that he had to
repair his antenna?

I may be wrong, but I do seem to recall that.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You also recall me saying ''meterhertz'' which I never said. Must be
fun, having a little world all to yourself.

Not so sure about the 'meterhertz' thing... but you sure did have that formula all
screwed up.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Drake R7, R8, R8A and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

Content? Yeah, just like cable TV. A thousand channels and nothing on.

Steve

On 23 Apr 2005 07:09:15 -0700, wrote:

Content? Yeah, just like cable TV. A thousand channels and nothing on.

Steve

Until you actually have an SDARS receiver shut the **** up.

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:57:32 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



David wrote:

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:05:38 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

That's not what your previous messages indicate.

He can't keep things straight. Didn't he say just a while back that he had to
repair his antenna?

I may be wrong, but I do seem to recall that.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You also recall me saying ''meterhertz'' which I never said. Must be
fun, having a little world all to yourself.

Not so sure about the 'meterhertz' thing... but you sure did have that formula all
screwed up.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Drake R7, R8, R8A and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm


I most certainly did not. Meters times Megahertz always equals 300.

David wrote:

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:57:32 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



David wrote:

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:05:38 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

That's not what your previous messages indicate.

He can't keep things straight. Didn't he say just a while back that he had to
repair his antenna?

I may be wrong, but I do seem to recall that.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You also recall me saying ''meterhertz'' which I never said. Must be
fun, having a little world all to yourself.

Not so sure about the 'meterhertz' thing... but you sure did have that formula all
screwed up.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Drake R7, R8, R8A and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm


I most certainly did not. Meters times Megahertz always equals 300.

No.... you are incorrect, 'tard boy...

Try to express the formula just a bit better. I just know you can, if you try.

A double dose of meds just might help.

dxAce
Michigan
USA