Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't want to start another flame war.
Byu your commnents in this gorup for at least the last 4 years you have shown a good deal of knowledge about RF. Your position on transformer vs resitive hybrids confusses me. Based on what I have read, transformer hybrids have 3 dB less loss then resitive ones. From your firm stance it is clear that you disagree. Since I respect your opinion I am interested on why you disagree. Trying to move this to Email to avoid wasting space and because I doubt if 1 SWL in 1000 care about this. r2000swl AT (replace with shift 2) hotmail dot com Sorry for the mangled address but Google even hides email addresses in the text of messages. Terry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will study both pdfs and see if I can come up with a couple of
experiments to see if I understand this. I am picking up a Pasternak PE2066 DC~6GHz with "N" connectors from a friend this afternoon. I have a 1W 7MHz/80Mtr QRP rig that I built to not only be a usefull CW QRP rig, but it will produce 1W into a 50 Ohm load "for ever". I have a Boonton "Microwatter" with a 431-4E "head" that is rated down to 30MHz. I will check it later today to see if it will work down to 7MHz, if not I will have to use my Diawa power meter, lowest scale is 5W FS. I have calibrated attenuators so I should be able to reduce the 1W to 10mw with no trouble. Iwold preffer to move up to so a frequency higher and further "in" to the ZFSC-2-1 pand pass, but unless I can fix a ~5W 6mtr CW rig I put away a lifetime ago I will have to work at 7MHz. Any errors ought to favor the resitive hybrid. I wonder if my IC-2AT at low power on 146.00MHz will work very well for a RF test souce, running from a 9V supply, it ought to be able to run "key down" on low power for a while before overheating. Terry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Telamon wrote: Remember to terminate all ports at all times or your results will vary. The transformer type of splitter will have a "U" shaped response curve so you need to be within that band for it to work right. The resistive type is good from DC to some max frequency and you need to be in that range. From the transmitter value each output port should be 3 dB down when the other output port is terminated in 50 ohms. The actual loss will be a little larger then 3 dB by the splitters insertion loss. Oh yeah, and your meter is probably a through type instead of a load type so you need to put a 50 ohm load on the far side of the meter. When you check each splitter also switch the meter and its load in each leg to see how balanced the splitter is in each output port. Be sure to turn the transmitter off before all connections are made or you could damage your transmitter. -- Telamon Ventura, California I made some measurements last night. I decided to move from ~7MHz to 146 because 7MHz is just too close to the lower limit on my mMc splitter. I have an IC28A that is adjusted to give 1wt in low power. I used a 10dB Narda 766-10 power attenuator in series with the splitter input. I used another 766-10 attenuator in series with the output and the sensor head on Boonton RF power meter. I used a .5% 50 ohm terminator for the other port The resitive splitter gave me 6dB of POWER loss. The MC transformer based splitter gave me just over 3.2dB of loss. I called a freshly frocked dual PHD, EE and physics, I know and asked her what the heck is happening. The quick answer is the resistive splitter is like any other resitive voltage divider. The transformer unit is like a transformer step down, or step up. The only losses in a transformer splitter are the wire losses and the core loss. The R in the MiniCircuits dispates no power if all ports are matched. She invited me to "her" lab Friday afternoon and she will use the modern equipment to verify my measurements. She suggested that I treat the resistive network and use kichoff's (?spelling?, it has been too long since college) law to show the dissapation of each element. It is too late tonight and my head hurts from this stuff. Oh, and cctual S-meter measurements show the MC splitter has half the loss of the resitive splitter. On a good note, I picked up a 3 section "dB Products" heavy aluminium mast and another MC splitter like mine and a 1 in 8 out RCA active LF/HF splitter rated for use from 100Kc to 40Mc. It used Nuvisters and appears to have selectable MB/BCB filters. No manual, and the only diagram is stincyled on the inside of the lid. And no model number only an old "Signal Corp" decal. My friend retired ATT microwave engineer and is moving to AZ because he is sick of the winter snow here. He has a storage building full of such junk and I get to cherry pick it and haul it to another friend. I hope to check the RCA coupler before going to the university lab. It would be nice to run a SN and frequency response. Terry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
freshly frocked!!??
cuhulin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
money | CB | |||
21st Century E-Commerce Money Making Formula | Antenna | |||
HAMS...be aware of the AFRICAN diamond email scam, heres some info and diamond quality scam | General | |||
Shortwave group.Check up email and maildrop still valid? controle of email / maildrop adres nog geldig is. | Shortwave |