Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 04:02 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:02:24 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



David wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:31:17 -0400, beerbarrel
wrote:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=5790213538


very pricey though!

No ''Bristo'' wrench?


Bristol?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm


That's what Xcelite calls them (part Number 99-66). My Army repair
manual repeatedly refers to them as ''Bristo'' however.


A typo.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #22   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 04:48 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:02:30 -0400, dxAce
wrote:


A typo.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

The Army never makes mistakes.

  #23   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 04:51 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:02:30 -0400, dxAce
wrote:

A typo.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

The Army never makes mistakes.


Sure they do... we all do. Take your mama for instance...

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm


  #24   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 05, 04:57 PM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Oh my gawd yes, state-of-the-art!!!

... 60 years ago or so...



Do you have some kind of problem with anything of any quality or

character?

Yes, the new stuff is small, light, etc.. and has lots of modes and such..
but it's almost uniformly garbage. And paying more money doesn't guarantee
anything.. look at the Satellit 800.


By historical standards, the Sat 800 isn't so expensive. Back in the 50s, a
mid-level receiver would run around $100 to $150. I'm sure it takes fewer
hours of work to afford a good performing radio today.


Back in the day, the cheap 'crap' of the day was so much better quality

and
built to last many times longer than the best there is today.


Quality as defined how? Selectivity and sensitivity have never been less
expensive. The old radios needed repairs and I'm sure we both have replaced
plenty of leaky paper caps, drifted carbon comp resistors and tubes. Yes,
the old radios were more repairable. They were made mostly with standard
parts and built by hand.



"Progress" isn't always good.



Imagine you could go back fifty years and had hundreds of thousands of
modern radios to sell, all at inflation corrected prices. Who would be
interested in the then current radios? Well, I suppose they'd be even more
interested in how you and all those radios got there. But that subject is
more on-topic in rec.time.machine.

Frank Dresser


  #26   Report Post  
Old July 24th 05, 02:53 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



beerbarrel wrote:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=5790213538

very pricey though!


Seems as though it was dropped from auction.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 November 28th 04 02:46 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 03:07 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 25th 04 08:32 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews CB 0 January 18th 04 10:36 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 10:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017