Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
it sounds like the E1 is better than I thought it would be, this one
could go down in history as a classic. I wonder if the Degen 1108 will be even better since it will have the E1 to jump off of. many of the complaints I have read seem to be of the "misunderstood" nature and if the designer was present to answer them would actually make sense. I believe that even though the set has XM circuitry, it is a bonus for american users and that the set was really designed for a global market and that is the reason for the antenna connector that is a pain for the US user. notice the choice for the FM range in the setup options. I have a feeling that they left out the ferrite antenna because the set is too big to rotate and they wanted it to be more omnidirectional for the average user and that anyone that cared to MW DX would not be stupid enough to use a built in rod and would use at least a hardwire connected select-a-tenna for max signal gathering. with a set of this awesome performance, ECSS is a waste of time. ecss is overrated because of the work involved in accurately tuning the signal for proper audio fidelity reconstruction and PHASING ! with the sync performance that is available ECSS sould be forgotten and use that selectable sync. even though I have no immediate plans to buy an E1, I will still study the manual. when I can get one for around $300 used, I will pick one up. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thoughts on the demise of the former BBC/DW Caribbean Relay Station... | Broadcasting | |||
Sony 7600GR any thoughts? | Shortwave | |||
ANY THOUGHTS ON THE GRUNDIG YB-550? | Shortwave | |||
Thoughts on odd behaviour of 10m vertical | Antenna | |||
Initial thoughts on my new 909 | Shortwave |