bpnjensen wrote:

dxAce wrote:

You spend a lot of your time worrying, don't you?

Yeah - It's a hallmark of people who give a damn about something.

That'll kill ya too.

Something's gotta do it, right?

Meat: What real DX'ers have for dinner.

Yum!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
oups.com...
MnMikew wrote:

You can't be serious? One does not have to kill or injure to terrorize.

No? What must one do, then? Define "terror" for me. Then I'll define
it again for you, since you didn't seem to latch onto who the real
terrorists are.

If "terror" is freeing animals from unspeakable misery, then I am a
terrorist sympathizer. I am not in favor of unnecessary damage.

Explain the dumpster full of dead animals that PETA killed.
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/press...fm/release/109

Since you didnt seem to latch on to it here it is for you.

terrorize
v 1: coerce by violence or with threats [syn: terrorise]
2: fill with terror; frighten greatly [syn: terrify, terrorise]

MnMikew wrote:
Since you didnt seem to latch on to it here it is for you.

terrorize
v 1: coerce by violence or with threats [syn: terrorise]
2: fill with terror; frighten greatly [syn: terrify, terrorise]

How much clearer can it be? If you don't do what they tell you to do,
they will sneak up on your back and do you serious harm.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

Explain the dumpster full of dead animals that PETA killed.
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/press...fm/release/109

Thanks, I will look into this. Meanwhile, who really funds this
website?

Since you didnt seem to latch on to it here it is for you.

terrorize
v 1: coerce by violence or with threats [syn: terrorise]
2: fill with terror; frighten greatly [syn: terrify, terrorise]

I agree with neither of these as appropriate tactics.

Having said this, it is then up to people to argue as to whether
specific actions constitute "terrorism." We may have differences of
opinion. Using explosives on labs definitely qualifies, as it raises
questions in the minds of owners and workers whether or not they could
be targeted during working hours. OTOH, mechanical destruction of
cages or abusive equipment does not, since the act and the result pose
no threat to the physical well-being of any worker.

I am not saying it isn't a crime - but it isn't terrorism.

Bruce Jensen

bpnjensen wrote:

dxAce wrote:

You spend a lot of your time worrying, don't you?

Yeah - It's a hallmark of people who give a damn about something.

No - It's a hallmark of people who sit around and do nothing. Folks who actually
go out and accomplish things don't spend time worrying.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

No - It's a hallmark of people who sit around and do nothing. Folks who actually
go out and accomplish things don't spend time worrying.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You plainly know not of what you speak.

Bruce Jensen

bpnjensen wrote:

No - It's a hallmark of people who sit around and do nothing. Folks who actually
go out and accomplish things don't spend time worrying.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You plainly know not of what you speak.

I'm sorry, but you're incorrect!

Stop worrying and get over it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You plainly know not of what you speak.

I'm sorry, but you're incorrect!

Stop worrying and get over it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Nope - you're clearly out to lunch with your gross assumption, as
usual.

Your move.

Bruce

bpnjensen wrote:

You plainly know not of what you speak.

I'm sorry, but you're incorrect!

Stop worrying and get over it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Nope - you're clearly out to lunch with your gross assumption, as
usual.

Your move.

LMFAO

It's not an assumption, it's simply reality.

Like I said, stop worrying and get over it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

It's not an assumption, it's simply reality.

Like I said, stop worrying and get over it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I'm sure that in your isolated little fantasy world, it seems true.
Sad.

BJ