Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Lawson wrote: I presume you're talking about the R2000 with the InRad and the Sync you made working in AM? Or are you working in ECSS? Yes it is the R2000 I got from Frank Cathell. I can do ECSS but so far synch has worked fine. I have the circuit boards for ISB which should allow some neat tricks but it will be next summer before I dive into that project. With ISB it is possible to reject "everything" but the signal yuou are after. I was going to ask if you're planning on playing with small loops so that you could lower the manmade noise floor, but I suspect based on what you wrote farther down that that is next summer's project. You are one lucky guy, you know that? Yea, I kind of figured that out. Most guys have to fight to get a SW into the house, me I have to fight to keep my wife from taking it from me. Somehow I feel so put upon. You don't have to fiddle with it at all to make it work well? I thought that was the knock against using something like a Sherwood: you had to fiddle with it a bit, and if you wanted seemless operation that was a pain in the neck. Once I got the levels correct form the buffer stage it worked great. I am using a cross between Pete's and this version: http://home.worldnet.att.net/~wa1sov/technical/sync_det.html There are some very good working designs in the yaho syncdetector group. You ought to offer mods for the R75 to make a more effective synch there. --Mike L. I don't have the time or space to get into commercial ventures. Maybe after I retire aI will think about something along those lines. Terry |