Bart Bailey wrote:
In ps.com

... The elimination of the venerable 'Battery Card'
as well as the hard copy catalog
is illustrative of the depths to which RS has sunk.

Dear Bart,

Not even to mention the elimination of many parts and other items which
were only locally available at Radio Shack.

And, dare I say it, the elimination of RADIOS?

Best,

Joe

Mike wrote:

In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote:

On Mon, 29 May 2006 12:42:56 -0400, Mike wrote:

In article a,
"jtaylor" wrote:

Why were they needed in the first place? The 9-volt package has a lot
more
package and a lot less mWatthrs in it. Was it because of the voltage -
did
the existing solid-state tech not work so well at 3V?

Probably. The very first transistor radios used a 45 volt battery!

MIke

Not exactly... some of the first radios with transistors in them (e.g. the
Emerson 838) used a 45 volt battery. But this battery was to supply the
plate B+ for the three peanut tubes in the RF/IF signal path. The transistor
audio outputs ran off the 4V "A" battery which also supplied the tube
heaters.

Actually, I was thinking of the first all-transistor radio -
specifically the Regency. But it uses a 22.5 bolt battery - my memory
was faulty.

IAC the point stands. Older transistor radios needed more volts
because of the low efficiency germanium transistors.

Mike


No, early germanium signal transistors didn't handle much current.
They were noisy, and had other problems that hadn't been ironed out
yet. They had a lot lower e-b voltage, and could be used at lower
voltages but it took a number of years to get the beta high enough to
make ones that had enough gain at a lower supply voltage.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Frank Dresser wrote:

"jtaylor" wrote in message
et.ca...
When I was little(r), almost all small portable radios used 9-volt
batteries. There were some, of course, that used AA's (or even 1 AA; I
had
an am portable with 1 AA cell that we snuck into school when
something-or-other REALLY important to schoolboys was going on), but now I
don't have & don't know of any radio that uses 9V batteries.

Why were they needed in the first place? The 9-volt package has a lot
more
package and a lot less mWatthrs in it. Was it because of the voltage -
did
the existing solid-state tech not work so well at 3V?



The existing solid state worked well enough at 6V. Zenith was making shirt
pocket portables in 1956 which were powered by 4AAs. The Zenith radio was
expensive, but the battery replacement was cheap.

I'll guess the reason most of the 1950s transistor radios started used 9V
batteries is because the lower price manufacturers wanted to get by with the
cheapest transistors which would do the job.

I suppose it's also possible the battery manufacturers were giving the low
end transistor radio manufacturers free batteries in order to later sell
short life, high profit replacement batteries.

As a side issue, many of the cheap American small transistor radios of the
fifties and early sixties used a cylinderical battery which contained a
stack of six round 1.5V cells. The Japanese companies prefered the now
familiar rectangular battery which had a stack of 6 rectangular cells, much
like the cells used in the B batteries of vacuum tube portables. Both of
the 9V batteries were lousy batteries and it's unfortunate that either
became the standard for transistor radios.

Frank Dresser


Weight and convenience. Flip the case open, unsnap the old battery
and snap in the new one, close the lid and you're done. Less chance of
someone using one or more old cells that would die and leak, as well.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

"Joe Analssandrini" wrote in message
ups.com...
Hello.

I always had a "soft spot" in my heart for the rectangular 9-volt
batteries as these were the norm when I got my first transistor radio -
a Realtone 6-transistor - which I thought was the absolute "cat's meow"
at the time. I used to go riding on my bicycle all over the place and I
always took this radio with me. I just couldn't imagine anything better
than to have a radio on my bike!*

The 9-volt batteries were very inexpensive. The Pep Boys, a local auto
parts store, sold them for 5 cents apiece! Later on, Radio Shack would
GIVE them away - you brought your "Radio Shack Battery Card" into the
store once a month and you could have one free battery of any of the
common sizes - AA, C, D, or 9-volt. As it took TWO months to get two
free AA's but only ONE month to get a free 9-volt, I always favored
9-volt-powered radios.

Today, I have two pocket AM-FM portables still in use - a Panasonic
Model RF-521, purchased sometime in the 1990s, which uses two AA
batteries, and a General Electric Model 7-2582D, purchased in the
1980s, and which uses the 9-volt battery. Both radios perform equally
regarding sensitivity, selectivity, and so forth, but the GE, being
slightly larger, has noticeably better sound quality.

Nowadays of course the 9-volt batteries are far more costly than two AA
batteries, though, in these radios, they seem to give equal length of
service.

I do not know if any radios are still being manufactured using 9-volt
batteries as their power supply.

I just still have my (irrational) "soft spot" for that battery!

Best,

Joe

Joe, your fond reminsinces make me realize that I may have been too harsh in
my stated opinions of the 9V battery. I don't want to give the impression
that I dislike 'em as much as I dislike -- say -- IBOC.

The lowest price I remember for the things was about 19 cents. The ones
wrapped in cellophane like a pack of cigarettes seemed to cost a few cents
more. But this was well after the fifties, when everything connected with
shirt pocket portables was still new and expensive. I've seen old Zenith
ads in which they claim that the difference in cost of replacing the
batteries in their AA penlite powered radios was enough to make up a
significant part of the increased price of their radios.

I do know that flashlight battery powered radios were cheaper to run than
transistor radio battery powered radios. We had a Silvertone radio which
would go a year between changing it's six D cells. I know that's not a fair
comparison with the 9V transistor radio battery, but the 9 volters seemed to
have a lifespan best measured in hours.

And it's not like I think the 9V battery is completely useless. I was
considering putting some LED illumination behind the dial of my
Hallicrafters TW 1000. I was concerned about the visibility of the dial
markings under the monochromatic illumination of the LEDs. So, I figured I
could take three different 9V battery snaps and LED up some red, yellow and
green flashlights. I didn't actually do it, but I did think of it. And I
also figured I could glue an opamp, deadbug style, and a tiny watch crystal
sized 100 kHz crystal, on a snap and make crystal calibrator. It works fine
on perfboard! That's not to mention the Zener diode noise generator and the
650/1300 kHz LC signal generator for peaking antenna/RF circuits. Yep, I
could have done it all on 9V snaps, but I didn't.

It's starting to look like 9V transistor radio batteries are more useful
than I am. Damn.


*Today I use a Sony ICF-SW35, normally kept in my car, when I go bike
riding. I STILL can't imagine anything better than having a radio on my
bike!

I'll take it you mean there's nothing better -- on a bike.

Frank Dresser

Joe Analssandrini wrote:

Nowadays of course the 9-volt batteries are far more costly than two AA
batteries, though, in these radios, they seem to give equal length of

I manage to get carbon-zinc 9-volt batts - either Eveready or Panasonic
in two-for-a-dollar packs at all the "Dollar Stores" here..

Of course, I can also get 4-packs of AA cells for a dollar (C-Zn also)
but I usually buy alkalines from Ikea Furniture, which comes out
cheaper.

9-volt alkalines are outrageously priced though. Almost $3 or $4.00 per
BATTERY? What the hell?

Radios work fine with a Carbon-Zinc battery though.

--
Steph