Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For One and All,
Up for your consideration is the simple fact that up until now the USA and "The World as a whole has had a uniform general Standard of {Common Reality} of an Analog AM/MW Radio Band; an FM Radio Band and Shortwave Radio Bands. This allowed a World-Wide-Commonality at least in some Radio/Receiver Circuitry. Does the Digital Radio Future Offer the same opportunity for a World-Wide-Commonality in some Radio/Receiver Circuitry. WHAT ABOUT - AM / FM DIGITAL RADIO ? Will the be a unique Digital Radio Design for AM/FM Radios built for sale in the USA ? And a completely different Digital Radio Design for AM/FM Radios built for sale in The-Rest-of-the-World ? Will Digital AM/FM Radios sold in Mexico and Canada be using the USA Digital Strandards or the Univeral Standard of The-Rest- of-the-World ? Will Americans have to have a Second Radio to Listen to Digital Radio Transmissions from The-Rest-of-the-World including Mexico and Canada ? What is the Canadian AM/FM Digital Radio Standard ? What is the Mexican AM/FM Digital Radio Standard ? What is the European AM/FM Digital Radio Standard ? - - - Who Will Africa Follow ? What is the Japanese & Korean AM/FM Digital Radio Standard ? - - - What Will The Rest of Asia Do ? What will become of the standard 'portable' AM / FM Shortwave Radio ? WHAT ABOUT - DIGITAL RADIO MONDIALE (DRM) ? ? ? With Respect To - Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) will the next generation of built for sale in the USA AM/FM Shortwave Radios have DRM as part of their built-in Circuitry ? About - Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) DRM = http://www.drm.org/. Or in the future, will their be a new breed of Stand-Along Shortwave Radio/Receivers that are "Shortwave Only" with built-in DRM Circuitry ? About - Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) DRM = http://www.drm.org/. GOING DIGITAL - Seems to be many paths headed-off in many National {USA} or Regional {Europe} directions where the World Wide Radio Listener is that last consideration [.] I Have Questions ! - Do You Have Any Answers ? ~ RHF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Early domestic-market Western European FM radios would cover 88 - 100.
Then the band was stretched to 104 in the 60s. In the late 1970s/ early 1980s, the band was stretched out to its current 108 MHz. True export models would cover the entire FM band 88-108. Any radio that only covered the 88-100 or 88-104 bands seen in the Americas were brought over by immigrants. Domestic Japanese-market radios cover the FM band from 76 to 91. I should know, I have a couple Japanese-market FM radios. The band between 91 and 108 is used for VHF TV audio channels 1, 2 and 3. Eastern-European/Russian FM radios cover the 66-74 megahertz band. That would be what we use for TV audio for Channel 2, 3 and 4. Using a Japanese radio, you can pick up USA TV audio channels 5 and 6. -- Steph |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephanie Weil" wrote in message oups.com... Early domestic-market Western European FM radios would cover 88 - 100. Then the band was stretched to 104 in the 60s. In the late 1970s/ early 1980s, the band was stretched out to its current 108 MHz. True export models would cover the entire FM band 88-108. Any radio that only covered the 88-100 or 88-104 bands seen in the Americas were brought over by immigrants. The European radios in Ecuador, which were the majority in 1966, were known brands like Telefunken and Grundig. Since there were no FM stations, there were only about 16, 000 of them then. Almost all were 88 to 100 MHz, including theone in my home. Most were consoles, with a record changer and all... in a credenza sized piece of furniture that, then, cost about $500 or more. Domestic Japanese-market radios cover the FM band from 76 to 91. I should know, I have a couple Japanese-market FM radios. The band between 91 and 108 is used for VHF TV audio channels 1, 2 and 3. The export ones in LAtin America must have been ones intended for other markets, as they were 76 to 100. Not many of them, though. Eastern-European/Russian FM radios cover the 66-74 megahertz band. That would be what we use for TV audio for Channel 2, 3 and 4. Never saw one of these, although the Czechs often tried to sell me transmitters full of Svetlanas. Using a Japanese radio, you can pick up USA TV audio channels 5 and 6. A friend did some consulting for J-Wave, an FM in Tokyo. They gave him a radio. It tunes the non-com band nicely, of course. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() RHF wrote: For One and All, I really only care about AM DXing; from what I have read about IBOC digital radio, is that the digital part is transmitted as both sidebands, so it really does affect the analog transmission, except for adjacent channel interference, because there is more energy put into the sidebands. I believe, that digital transmissions do not carry, as far as analog, so in the case of a pure digital receiver, it will still pick up the analog transmissions, once the digital sidebands fade. We should be able to use our analog receivers, even though stations are transmitting in digital, as many of them already are, for example, 700 WLW. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
The European radios in Ecuador, which were the majority in 1966, were known brands like Telefunken and Grundig. Since there were no FM stations, there were only about 16, 000 of them then. Almost all were 88 to 100 MHz, including theone in my home. Most were consoles, with a record changer and all... in a credenza sized piece of furniture that, then, cost about $500 or more. Most of the few vintage FM radios I saw in Colombia were all 88-108. But those were mostly all transistorized. All the tube radios I saw there were MW/SW only. I brought back two, a huge Grundig and a smaller Philco-Tropic made in the UK. My grandmother has her 1940s Philips MW/SW set. As you said, German and Dutch brands ruled. The export ones in LAtin America must have been ones intended for other markets, as they were 76 to 100. Not many of them, though. I remember seeing a couple Japanaese AM/FMs in a pawn shop. They were 88-108, but these were from the 1970s. Wayy too beat-up and battered for my taste, so I didn't get them. But then Ecuador and Colombia are two very different animals. I'm pretty sure that Colombia got into the FM game much earlier than Ecuador - at least in the major cities like Bogota (now-departed HJCK, for instance). Most Japanese analog-tuned portables cover 76-108 anyway, so that their owners can take the radios outside the country and have them work. In Japan they're marketed as FM/TV. It's a different ball game with the digital units and home/car stereos, though. Once again, this is just from the ones I've seen and played with. Here is an old Polish FM radio (not mine, unfortunately): http://www.astercity.net/~janekr/1.jpg A friend did some consulting for J-Wave, an FM in Tokyo. They gave him a radio. It tunes the non-com band nicely, of course. Oh yeah, that's about the only FM radio you can pick up with them. Here's an OLD Sanyo add-on tuner made for the Japanese market: http://radiomann.hp.infoseek.co.jp/H...-sanyoSFT1.JPG and an old Pioneer table-top radio (FM only, and the dial knob is missing) http://radiomann.hp.infoseek.co.jp/H...F6-Pioniaf.JPG Hope he still has it. Foreign-market electronics can be a cool thing, well....if you're a nut-case like me and collect radios.... but that's a whole different story. ![]() -- Steph |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DX Ace - You forgot to say :
Thus Sayest I - The DX Ace ! ![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DE,
But now imagine in 2006 doing the same thing - Impossible ! With each of these made-for the Japanese, German and American Radio Market radios had a different Digital Audio Broadcast (DAB) Standard ! ! ! Do you now Broadcast (Transmit) in each of the Multi-Standards so that all Radios will work ? ? ? -Or- Do you Broadcast (Transmit) using one standard and miss some of your potential Listeners who have Radios that can not receive your type of Digital Signal. For Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) to work World Wide there needs to be a 'uniform' World Wide Standard for all Transmitters and Receivers. Unless the intent is to Nationalize and Regionalize Radio Listening and therefore Eliminate International {Trans-Regional} Radio Listening. As bad as Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) may be . . . At least it is a World Wide Standard and may be in time technology will evolve that will enable the reduction of out-of-channel digital artifacts. Why Is . . . Digital Radio needed below 30 MHz ? WHY DRM = http://www.drm.org/system/whydigital.php DRM TECH = http://www.drm.org/system/technicalaspect.php DRM is the world's only, open standard digital radio system for Short-Wave, AM/Medium-Wave and Long-Wave. DRM has been endorsed by the ITU, IEC and ETSI. IMHO - DRM should be the 'uniform' World Wide Standard for all DAB below 30 MHz and a 'uniform' World Wide Standard implemented for FM Band Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) World Wide. Then for good-or-bad at least there would be a new World Wide "Standard" 'portable' AM / FM Shortwave Radio that would be available for all Radio Listeners around the World. And future Shortwave Receivers hey - it's just one radio listener's opinion ~ RHF |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() RHF wrote: To me a PC Based IBOC "HD" AM/FM Radio Plug-and-Play Card is a better "First Product" for Radio Manufactures then a Home IBOC "HD" AM/FM Radio or a Automotive IBOC "HD" AM/FM Radio. More "Earily Adapters" will buy a PC Based "HD" Radio -IMHO- before they would buy an "HD" Radio for Home or Car. I'd rather have a stand-alone radio. The circuitry can be made better (in theory) and it's just more transportable. You can pick up the radio and carry it to the kitchen, the living room, the porch.... Can't do that with a computer, unless you have one of those laptops with REAL CHEESY tin-ear speakers. But then, radio tuner cards are pointless to me unless you make a habit of using the computer as a sort of "skimmer" or "logger" -- Steph |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: That would have been later. When I went on the air, in 1966, the closest FMs were in Lima and San José, CR. None at all in Venezuela and Colombia or Panamá, and nothing north of Lima in Perú. There were many in Brasil,far, far away, used as STLs. HJCK's website says the station went on the air in 1950. http://www.hjck.com/historia.asp "founded on September 15, 1950 with the purpose of raising the culture level of Bogota radio..." By the way, HJCK turned around recently and LMAed their 89.9 FM frequency to Caracol, which in turn, plugged in the "Las 40 Prinicpales" CHR format. *shudder* HJCK is now only heard on the internet. Bummer. ![]() At least Cali still has HJSA on FM, the classical station owned by the Carvajal office/business services conglomerate -- Steph |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Stephanie Weil wrote: RHF wrote: To me a PC Based IBOC "HD" AM/FM Radio Plug-and-Play Card is a better "First Product" for Radio Manufactures then a Home IBOC "HD" AM/FM Radio or a Automotive IBOC "HD" AM/FM Radio. More "Earily Adapters" will buy a PC Based "HD" Radio -IMHO- before they would buy an "HD" Radio for Home or Car. I'd rather have a stand-alone radio. The circuitry can be made better (in theory) and it's just more transportable. You can pick up the radio and carry it to the kitchen, the living room, the porch.... Can't do that with a computer, unless you have one of those laptops with REAL CHEESY tin-ear speakers. But then, radio tuner cards are pointless to me unless you make a habit of using the computer as a sort of "skimmer" or "logger" -- Steph If you need a PC, why not just stream the audio in the first place. I'm not a fan of toys that require a PC. The ability to hook one up is always nice (radio programming, GPS trail playback, etc), but the requirement to use a PC isn't good. Standards change, the OS changes, then you are left with junk if the manufacturer doesn't support the product. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The main problem with Ham radio... | Policy | |||
WKMI sounds owful what's the problem? | Broadcasting |