Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Stephanie Weil wrote: RHF wrote: June 5, 2006: Since World War II, the U.S. Armed Forces Radio (AFR) has broadcast to the troops, no matter where they are. But declining ratings, caused by iPods and changing tastes, has resulted in massive changes in what will be heard. The damned I-Pods sound better than AFRTS's product. At least the Korean AFN-Korea stations!!! The AFRTS station in Anjong-Ri (Camp Humphries) on 1440 AM sounds all overmodulated. It's still listenable on better-quality radios, but only just. The FM station on 88.3 is worse - it sounds like a buzz-saw. And no, it's got nothing to do with the hard-rock that they play. ![]() Who the hell can listen to that tripe for a prolonged period of time. It hurts the skull. Also gone is most of the talk radio (NPR, as well as more conservative shows). Talk just never caught on big with the troops, and many were turned off by the strident anti-war attitudes found on many NPR shows. The last thing you want to hear after a long day of shooting at unknown people is some loud-mouth back home sitting in his air-conditioned studio and talking bull through a tin-horn. You clearly don't listen to NPR. Not only is it fair and balanced, but they treat the war dead with respect. The AFN shortwave sounds very good. As I've mentioned before, the sideband sounds to me like it is wider than your run of the mill communication sideband. I generally use a 4Khz filter on AFN. Varied music, with periodic HONEST news updates and balanced commentary is the best way to go, in my opinion. Of course, don't neglect the sports events. ![]() I wonder what's going to happen to the Uninterrupted Voice Channel that's broadcast on SSB Shortwave. Figures that as soon as I contemplate a portable SSB radio, they'll probably take it off the air. ![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't have an iPod even if you gave me one for free.I just dont
like them stupid lookin iPod C... Suckers! cuhulin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Miso,
"and many were turned off by the strident anti-war attitudes found on many NPR shows." - - - This Is Not My Opinion - - - And I do in-fact Listen to NPR and think for the most part that it is reasonably balanced. Here is My Opinion - Often NPR comes across as being Tilted to the Left. Frequently as I Listen to an NPR Program the Guest Panel would have three members - two liberals and one moderate -vice- a more Balance Panel of a Liberal + a Moderate + a Conservative. {my opinion ~ RHF} Think About the Military Service Member the Target Listener of AFN and AFRTS : I can see that anyone in the Military who is out-there actually fighting the War-on-Terror would be sensitive to anything 'anti-war' and thus anything that was 'anti' whatever they were personally doing. Reporting-the-Facts : What the reporter wrote -one assumes- is what he heard from Members of the Military In-Country who 'feel' NPR has more positive Anti-War Air Time then it has Pro-War-on-Terror Air Time. NPR via AFN and AFRTS should Speak-to-the-Troops and not Lecture them about the In-Justice of their Service and the Wrongness of their Fight in the War-on-Terror. The Role of VOA is "NOT" to be a Propaganda Tool of the US Government to the American People -but- To Get America's Message Out to the Peoples of the World . The Role of AFN & AFTRS "IS" to be a Propaganda Tool of the US Government to the American Military Services and to help Maintain and Improve Troop Moral and the Fighting Readiness of the American Military. so say i - my opinions stated as facts ~ RHF |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They never asked me,in Vietnam,what I thought.I probally would have gave
them a dumb look anyway and said something like,Huh!,I dont know,I am just here. cuhulin |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need to go to my bathroom.My new snail mail issue of Popular Mechanics
magazine for July 2006 showed up in my snail mail box by the side of the road this morning. cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|