Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember someone using a VCR tape for audio recording from the radio.
He set the record time to six hours and when recording, would write down the time in order to locate a desired segment at a later date. How is the sound quality at such a slow tape speed? Speech may be acceptable, but would music still be of good enough quality? mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() m II wrote: I remember someone using a VCR tape for audio recording from the radio. He set the record time to six hours and when recording, would write down the time in order to locate a desired segment at a later date. How is the sound quality at such a slow tape speed? Speech may be acceptable, but would music still be of good enough quality? mike The sound quality is more than adequate for shortwave. Many VCRs act funny if you try to record without video present, so you need to use the VCR in simulcast mode. It doesn't matter what video you use. THe VCR needs the video for timing. I think recording on the PC is less work, plus you can use sound editors such as Audacity, SoundForge, etc. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
m II wrote:
I remember someone using a VCR tape for audio recording from the radio. He set the record time to six hours and when recording, would write down the time in order to locate a desired segment at a later date. How is the sound quality at such a slow tape speed? Speech may be acceptable, but would music still be of good enough quality? If you're using an earlier, linear track only machine, slow speed audio can be pretty poor. VHS Hi-Fi, though, can be surprisingly good even at the slowest speed. I frequently used a VHS Hi-Fi machine for airchecks when producing large scale field events that would sometimes run two or three days. The audio was always so good I never had to be embarrassed about the quality when I presented a recording to a client, or host sponsor. mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hate to sound smart but you can easily buy a voice recorder for cheap
or an mp3 recorder (hell if you have one they might have one there i know mine does) or a mini disc recorder if your so incline.VHS sound quality deteriorates quickly,after a few plays it would be starting to go funny.Also with the first two you dont need to buy any medium maybe a USB drive if you want it to be completely portable. Yours truly Adam |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with adam here.
I use a mini-disc recorder for this. Great application. adam wrote: I hate to sound smart but you can easily buy a voice recorder for cheap or an mp3 recorder (hell if you have one they might have one there i know mine does) or a mini disc recorder if your so incline.VHS sound quality deteriorates quickly,after a few plays it would be starting to go funny.Also with the first two you dont need to buy any medium maybe a USB drive if you want it to be completely portable. Yours truly Adam |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:04:48 GMT, m II wrote:
I remember someone using a VCR tape for audio recording from the radio. He set the record time to six hours and when recording, would write down the time in order to locate a desired segment at a later date. How is the sound quality at such a slow tape speed? Speech may be acceptable, but would music still be of good enough quality? Use VHS HiFi. It records with an FM carrier. Excellent quality. Use a cheap video camera to record a clock. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the VCR is of a stereo Hi-Fi vintage than the audio is recorded
digitally. It is fairly close to CD quality. Few people are aware of this fact. The recorded audio is much better than the heavilly compressed digital mp3. "m II" wrote in message news:QPXxg.141889$I61.17781@clgrps13... I remember someone using a VCR tape for audio recording from the radio. He set the record time to six hours and when recording, would write down the time in order to locate a desired segment at a later date. How is the sound quality at such a slow tape speed? Speech may be acceptable, but would music still be of good enough quality? mike |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:18:21 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote: If the VCR is of a stereo Hi-Fi vintage than the audio is recorded digitally. It is fairly close to CD quality. Few people are aware of this fact. FM, not digital. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
VCR Hi-Fi records/reads audio two ways:
The old analog way with the linear audio track on the long side of the tape. This mode is FM and is backward compatable with non-HiFi recorded tapes. The HiFi audio mode is Pulse Code Modulation. PCM is used to record audio with the video head but separate from the video. The video head takes a swipe across the tape. When it reaches near the bottom, it stops recording video and starts recording DIGITAL audio using the same head. During playback, the head listens for video sending it to the screen and when it reaches the end of a swipe, shifts its attention to audio sending the digits to a circuit that converts the signal back into stereo sound. If the DIGITAL audio is not present on the tape the HiFi VCR will use the old analog FM linear audio track instead. In the 1980s and 1990s, some people used the Hi-Fi tracks on VHS and BetaMax VCRs to record audio. This was a stopgap measure while affordable digital audio was being developed and sounded far better than audio cassettes. "David" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:18:21 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog" wrote: If the VCR is of a stereo Hi-Fi vintage than the audio is recorded digitally. It is fairly close to CD quality. Few people are aware of this fact. FM, not digital. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|