wrote:
On 27 Sep 2006 04:39:17 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd"
wrote:


wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:15:47 GMT, "James Philopena"
wrote:

I'm relatively new to the group, but I can already tell you're the group
troll.

Having been active in the rec.photo groups for sometime, I understand
trolls, but at least you have a beef with something tangible.

Let's face it. You most likely are one of those who got their General at 13
WPM, maybe their Extra at 20 and hate the no coders and those who got their
license by only taking code at 5WPM. Well, who cares. It's time for you to
accept reality and come to the conclusion, you out lived Morse Code. Get on
with life.
while he refuses to give his call he claims to a 20 wpm extra

He claims to be intelligent like you do, too, Markie, Factual evidence
shows that to be contrary.
lying agin Woger he has made no such claim you always lie woger

You just proved you aren't intelligent, once again, Markie.

In article ,
says...
Huh? Ingles, por favor...no comprehende. Can you communicate in English?


"Sal M. Onella" wrote in message
news:veISg.166$gM1.148@fed1read12...


How? In that nobody does it? Bad simile, OM.





swoooop, right over your head!!!!!!!!!

73

Chris

wrote:
On 26 Sep 2006 17:37:25 -0700, wrote:


James Philopena wrote:

If you have a Call Book with that last one in it, you have definitely out
live Morse Code - time to get back to ashes and dust.

Welcome. I've always said that a healthy application of the actuarial
tables will take care of most of the grumblers...
SOON PLEASE

You'll be right in there, Spammer!

Slow Code wrote:
Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC

The answer is "yes it is a real contact" and so far as you were
communicating with some one using a radio it also is "like talking to
someone on CB."

Dude, your arrogance is showing.

AC7PN

Slow Code wrote:

Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.

They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

In article ,
says...
Slow Code wrote:

Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.

They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


What if they copy you with a computer?

73

Chris

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.

They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

How do you know? Just because they aren't licensed doesn't mean they can't
copy CW. My officemate has no license at all but thanks to the military can
probably copy better than I can.

I'm not licensed to do LOTS of things that I can do.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.

They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


Many use "QSO" as a signifier of a "Voice" contact as well, so "why"
couldn't you have a "QSO" with a "NO CODE" Tech? Now, if the question were a
QSO with one on a band he wasn't licensed to use, then the answer "could" be
NO. BUT - if he has a "Control Operator" there with him to allow his use of
that band, then by all means - the answer is still "yes".

Its all in how it is looked at. Too many people split hairs............

"AC7PN" wrote in
ups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC

The answer is "yes it is a real contact" and so far as you were
communicating with some one using a radio it also is "like talking to
someone on CB."

Dude, your arrogance is showing.

AC7PN


What's wrong with that, if it helps motivate people to be better hams.
Unfortunately, most here don't want better hams.


SC

Dave wrote:
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com