Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana, October
11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding complaints against
the operation of your station" involving interference on HF and 2 meters. In
another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F. Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of
Diamond Springs, California, that his license renewal application has been
designated for hearing after a review of "numerous complaints filed against
the operation of your station" alleging deliberate interference.

Hearings are held in Washington, DC, before an administrative law judge, and
the applicants will have the burden of proof in showing they're still
qualified to be Amateur Radio licensees. Over the past several years, the
FCC has asked both licensees to respond to allegations of deliberate
interference on the amateur bands.

"A.E. 352" wrote in
:

Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana,
October 11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding
complaints against the operation of your station" involving interference
on HF and 2 meters. In another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F.
Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of Diamond Springs, California, that his
license renewal application has been designated for hearing after a
review of "numerous complaints filed against the operation of your
station" alleging deliberate interference.

Hearings are held in Washington, DC, before an administrative law judge,
and the applicants will have the burden of proof in showing they're
still qualified to be Amateur Radio licensees. Over the past several
years, the FCC has asked both licensees to respond to allegations of
deliberate interference on the amateur bands.




Yep, if you don't play nice with your new shiny license, then you will suffer
the consequences. It happen to the nocoders also since one has nothing to do
with the other. Bad hams are bad hams weither or not they can read morse
code, has nothing to do with it. Of courae you already knew that didn't you
???

PLONK

--
Panzer

THIS GUY OWES ME MONEY, ANYONE ELSE HAVE THAT SAME PROBLEM?

WHERE IS TIM THESE DAYS? MAYBE BEHIND BARS I HOPE!


I WANT MY DAMN MONEY., IM CLOSING OUT ALL BAD DEBTS TO ME THIS YEAR OF
2006 NOW!


TIM WE HAVE FOUND YOU!
"A.E. 352" wrote in message
...
Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana,
October
11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding complaints
against
the operation of your station" involving interference on HF and 2 meters.
In
another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F. Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of
Diamond Springs, California, that his license renewal application has been
designated for hearing after a review of "numerous complaints filed
against
the operation of your station" alleging deliberate interference.

Hearings are held in Washington, DC, before an administrative law judge,
and
the applicants will have the burden of proof in showing they're still
qualified to be Amateur Radio licensees. Over the past several years, the
FCC has asked both licensees to respond to allegations of deliberate
interference on the amateur bands.

"A.E. 352" wrote in
:

Is this what happends after folks pass the code test?


Hollingsworth told David O. Castle, WA9KJI, of Evansville, Indiana,
October 11 that the WTB referral was the result of "longstanding
complaints against the operation of your station" involving interference
on HF and 2 meters. In another case, Hollingsworth wrote William F.
Crowell, W6WBJ (ex-N6AYJ), of Diamond Springs, California, that his
license renewal application has been designated for hearing after a
review of "numerous complaints filed against the operation of your
station" alleging deliberate interference.


You think that's bad, you should hear the retarded assholes on CB.

SC

Hello. I'm Bill Crowell, W6WBJ, and I've been a ham for 47 years now.
I'm a good operator, and I'm here to tell you that Riley Hollingsworth
is full of ****. He HAS NOT designated my renewal application for a
hearing; he just wanted to defame my by trying to make everyone THINK
he had done so. If you carefully read the warning notice which he sent
me, you'll note that it says, in pertinent part:

"the issue of renewal of your license has been referred for designation
of a hearing"

What this means is:

(1) it hasn't been designated for a hearing yet. It's merely been
"referred" for such a designation. No hearing date has been set, nor
is it clear that one will EVER be set.

(2) "referred for designation" simply means that Riley the bull****
artist has asked his superiors for permission to take my case to a
hearing. It is by no means clear that they will grant his request.
Hearings are expensive, and there is no reason to take me to a hearing
because I've done nothing wrong. Indeed, judging by the passage of
time since he sent me my warning notice, with no hearing deisgnation
order yet issued, it looks increasingly unlikely that such permission
has been granted.

What we have here, gentlemen, is another example of Riley Hollywood
pulling the wool over your eyse by trying to make it appear that he is
taking me to a hearing, when in fact he has not done so. You have been
used. Abused. When are you going to wake up to what a dirty son of a
bitch old Riley is?