Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"amdx" wrote in
: "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I prefer getting the code requirement back up to somewhere between 13 and 20 wpm for all hams. SC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
"amdx" wrote in : "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. Why don't you start by being civil on Usenet? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do Like I did, Put SC on ignore.
He obviously wants to drive everyone from Ham Radio. He has a Bile taste in his mouth from a bad experiance so he now wishes everyone to have a bad experiance. He will not rest till he drives everyone from Ham Radio. So I ignore him as he no longer provides value for my reading time. Its the old Crusty Crumudgeons like him that drive the new people away. Rick Scott W7PSK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "amdx" wrote in : "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I prefer getting the code requirement back up to somewhere between 13 and 20 wpm for all hams. SC Hi Slow Code, I don't normally open your posts ( didn't note the sender this time) so I don't know if your the nicest person on usenet or a jerk. I do know that your posts seem to turn into arguments about personalities and disrupt the flow of helpful info that can pass on rec.radio.amateur.antenna. I think this newsgroup is dying a slow death and suspect many are leaving because of drivel such as yours. I know I have contemplated dropping rec.radio.amateur.antenna off of my list, there is just to much on the net to put up with much garbage. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I have been listening to the hams bands for years and noted plenty of room for intelligence and civility, I don't think no-code has added in more room. The biggest problem I have noted is intentional interference on polite roundtable conversation. Hmm! That seems to be what you do, only you do it on multiple frequencies (newsgroups) at the same time. Mike |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"amdx" wrote in
: "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "amdx" wrote in : "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I prefer getting the code requirement back up to somewhere between 13 and 20 wpm for all hams. SC Hi Slow Code, I don't normally open your posts ( didn't note the sender this time) so I don't know if your the nicest person on usenet or a jerk. I do know that your posts seem to turn into arguments about personalities and disrupt the flow of helpful info that can pass on rec.radio.amateur.antenna. I think this newsgroup is dying a slow death and suspect many are leaving because of drivel such as yours. I know I have contemplated dropping rec.radio.amateur.antenna off of my list, there is just to much on the net to put up with much garbage. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I have been listening to the hams bands for years and noted plenty of room for intelligence and civility, I don't think no-code has added in more room. The biggest problem I have noted is intentional interference on polite roundtable conversation. Hmm! That seems to be what you do, only you do it on multiple frequencies (newsgroups) at the same time. Mike No one will enjoy being a ham with the bands totally sound like 11 meters. SC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"R. Scott" wrote in message
... Do Like I did, Put SC on ignore. He obviously wants to drive everyone from Ham Radio. He has a Bile taste in his mouth from a bad experiance so he now wishes everyone to have a bad experiance. He will not rest till he drives everyone from Ham Radio. So I ignore him as he no longer provides value for my reading time. Its the old Crusty Crumudgeons like him that drive the new people away. Rick Scott W7PSK He isn't driving "me" away from ham. People like him - come and go every day in my life. I look past them. I just wish "others" in "here" did that! His posts are ruining "these" newsgroups. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Radiosrfun" wrote in message
... "R. Scott" wrote in message ... Do Like I did, Put SC on ignore. He obviously wants to drive everyone from Ham Radio. He has a Bile taste in his mouth from a bad experiance so he now wishes everyone to have a bad experiance. He will not rest till he drives everyone from Ham Radio. So I ignore him as he no longer provides value for my reading time. Its the old Crusty Crumudgeons like him that drive the new people away. Rick Scott W7PSK He isn't driving "me" away from ham. People like him - come and go every day in my life. I look past them. I just wish "others" in "here" did that! His posts are ruining "these" newsgroups. And for what it is worth, I've been an Extra for about 12 years now. No one yet - knows what SC is/was! He's never said, that "I" know of. Though I have my "Extra" - I kept my "Novice" call sign. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Radiosrfun" wrote in message ... "Radiosrfun" wrote in message ... "R. Scott" wrote in message ... Do Like I did, Put SC on ignore. He obviously wants to drive everyone from Ham Radio. He has a Bile taste in his mouth from a bad experiance so he now wishes everyone to have a bad experiance. He will not rest till he drives everyone from Ham Radio. So I ignore him as he no longer provides value for my reading time. Its the old Crusty Crumudgeons like him that drive the new people away. Rick Scott W7PSK He isn't driving "me" away from ham. People like him - come and go every day in my life. I look past them. I just wish "others" in "here" did that! His posts are ruining "these" newsgroups. And for what it is worth, I've been an Extra for about 12 years now. No one yet - knows what SC is/was! He's never said, that "I" know of. Though I have my "Extra" - I kept my "Novice" call sign. That is "ok", you can keep any "call" sign you want. "Nobody" cares. Why all the quotation marks????? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R. Scott wrote:
Do Like I did, Put SC on ignore. He obviously wants to drive everyone from Ham Radio. He has a Bile taste in his mouth from a bad experiance so he now wishes everyone to have a bad experiance. He will not rest till he drives everyone from Ham Radio. So I ignore him as he no longer provides value for my reading time. Its the old Crusty Crumudgeons like him that drive the new people away. Rick Scott W7PSK What is interesting is for every post SC makes, you whining crybabies make 10! As for driving people away, Ham Radio needs more QUALITY not QUANTITY! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Radiosrfun" wrote in
: "R. Scott" wrote in message ... Do Like I did, Put SC on ignore. He obviously wants to drive everyone from Ham Radio. He has a Bile taste in his mouth from a bad experiance so he now wishes everyone to have a bad experiance. He will not rest till he drives everyone from Ham Radio. So I ignore him as he no longer provides value for my reading time. Its the old Crusty Crumudgeons like him that drive the new people away. Rick Scott W7PSK He isn't driving "me" away from ham. People like him - come and go every day in my life. I look past them. I just wish "others" in "here" did that! His posts are ruining "these" newsgroups. You think this is bad, you ain't seen bad. Just wait until the Lids take over HF after CW is eliminated, then you'll be sorry. That is, You'll be sorry unless you like what CB sounds like. SC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change | Antenna | |||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change | Equipment | |||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments | Policy |