Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The code hating losers were too stupid and lazy to learn and use CW,
they're also probably going to be too stupid and lazy to solve TVI and interference problems with their neigbhors. There will be more amateur to amateur and amateur to non-amateur conflicts. Hams will look bad and the FCC will regulate the service more because of all the retards we let have HF privledges. CQ Breaker, CQ Breaker. Welcome to CB everybody. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FCC, in our Democratic society, asked for input on the code/no-code
issue for quite awhile from the ham radio community. The MAJORITY of hams voted to do away with Morse Code so that's why it's now gone. Additionally, after the World Radio Conference (WRC) of 2005, 99.9% of the other countries decided to eliminate the code as well, with only the U.S. and a couple of others hanging on to this antiquated mode. Incidently, the ham bands NEVER became "CB-like" in the countries who have already dropped the code years ago. Hams in places like Canada, Mexico, Europe, Africa, and Austrailia noticed no change to the bands whatsoever. So...you, and others like you, can quit crying 'Wolf' now. "Retard Invasion" wrote in message nk.net... The code hating losers were too stupid and lazy to learn and use CW, they're also probably going to be too stupid and lazy to solve TVI and interference problems with their neigbhors. There will be more amateur to amateur and amateur to non-amateur conflicts. Hams will look bad and the FCC will regulate the service more because of all the retards we let have HF privledges. CQ Breaker, CQ Breaker. Welcome to CB everybody. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" wrote in message ... The FCC, in our Democratic society, asked for input on the code/no-code issue for quite awhile from the ham radio community. The MAJORITY of hams voted to do away with Morse Code so that's why it's now gone. What was the official tally? I didn't get a ballot (which is not very democratic in my opinion ![]() Additionally, after the World Radio Conference (WRC) of 2005, 99.9% of the other countries decided to eliminate the code as well, with only the U.S. and a couple of others hanging on to this antiquated mode. If your figure of 99.9% is correct, and there are approximately 250 soveriegn countries in the world, this would mean that (1.000 - 0.999) X (250) countries still have the code requirement. That would be 0.25 countries that retained code. Since this number must be an integer, we must round it down to 0. Is zero correct? Incidently, the ham bands NEVER became "CB-like" in the countries who have already dropped the code years ago. I'm not sure that CB in those countries ever became CB-like in the American sense. Hams in places like Canada, Mexico, Europe, Africa, and Austrailia noticed no change to the bands whatsoever. Aha, but they don't have a kb9rqz in those countries either ;-)) So...you, and others like you, can quit crying 'Wolf' now. I'm sure you were not addressing this post to me :-)) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|