Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheesh.... must be nice to have nothing better to than feed the trolls. What
a waste of bandwidth.....and all the cross posting?? I would have thought that the folks on here were trained better than that. "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "CW" wrote in message news:JPPtb.167769$275.515252@attbi_s53... The only exception, according to the Customs Service is cars. If anything is misrepresented when sold, the seller is liable. Customs would have nothing to do with that other than their law being precedent. Well, if the issue is misrepresention of an item as an antique, then I expect the buyer would have to show that the misrepresentation created a false expectation of an item's market value. In that case, the marketplace defination of an antique would be relevant. I don't see how the US Customs defination would apply, unless there was some Federal beef about import taxes. Frank Dresser |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only exception, according to the Customs Service is cars. If anything
is misrepresented when sold, the seller is liable. Dang! Guess we're on the hook for all those "antique airplanes" we used to own! Oops....they didn't HAVE (flyable) powered airplanes 100 years ago! (this obviously becomes moot on Dec. 3rd) Darn. All joking aside, pre-WW2 birds are considered "antique" and post war birds are considered "classics." Forget the exact breakpoint, but NOT 100 years for obvious reasons. However, back to topic....can ANYTHING with transistors in it be considered "antique?" A |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|