Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RARE Yamaha TX-1000 AM/FM TUNER. A DX-er specialty:
For auction now on ebay (SUN JAN 18 to Sat Jan 24,2004) Suited to DXers who want to grab weak FM signals other receivers just can't get. Unmatched by ANY. Selectable bandwith and very fine tuning. Unbeatable audiophile fidelity as well. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3072570149 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are a little bit off on that one..............the McIntosh MR78 is the
best FM Dx tuner, bar none. The next best tuner might be the top of the line Magnum Dynalab, perhaps followed by the Onkyo 9090, the Marantz 10B.................it would be a good idea to do some research, before using those kinds of superlatives. As a matter of fact, I don't know if there is any FM tuner on the market that can handle 12 volts of RF at the antenna input, the way the MR78 does, or that has that 55dB adjacent channel selectivity. Some of the modded FM tuners might be able to do do this, once you install the Murata 110kHz ceramic filters, but still, I don't know if they would achieve the ultimate selectivity that the crystal filter in the MR78 uses. Pete "R. Valentine" wrote in message om... RARE Yamaha TX-1000 AM/FM TUNER. A DX-er specialty: For auction now on ebay (SUN JAN 18 to Sat Jan 24,2004) Suited to DXers who want to grab weak FM signals other receivers just can't get. Unmatched by ANY. Selectable bandwith and very fine tuning. Unbeatable audiophile fidelity as well. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3072570149 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well Pete, I Have An MR78 (photo of it with the TX-1000 on top of it for you
at link: http://www.vtxpress.com/block/tx-mr.jpg and have side by sided them extensively with rooftop antenna with rotor. They are both receiving a very marginal signal at 101.1 WCBS NYC, from Central CT. in the photo. So I have done actual - research. Heres the deal, The MR78..because it has no remote or presets or precise freq. display, lost ground to the yamaha. If both were strictly manual tune, I'd give it to the MR78, not to mention it's beautiful looks. But thats my reasoning. As for DX signals, theres never been any weakest of weak signal on the MR78 that I couldnt also get on the TX1000, and vice-versa. They are that closely matched. I will conceed that perhaps "One Of The Best....." would have been a better subject header.. and I was considering it, but ... eh'... I will next time. I do appreciate the feedback. Hope readers enjoy the photo. I have a great time with both receivers and that classic rotor setup. rick "R. Valentine" wrote in message om... RARE Yamaha TX-1000 AM/FM TUNER. A DX-er specialty: For auction now on ebay (SUN JAN 18 to Sat Jan 24,2004) Suited to DXers who want to grab weak FM signals other receivers just can't get. Unmatched by ANY. Selectable bandwith and very fine tuning. Unbeatable audiophile fidelity as well. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3072570149 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "richard valentine" wrote in message ... Well Pete, I Have An MR78 (photo of it with the TX-1000 on top of it for you at link: http://www.vtxpress.com/block/tx-mr.jpg and have side by sided them extensively with rooftop antenna with rotor. They are both receiving a very marginal signal at 101.1 WCBS NYC, from Central CT. in the photo. So I have done actual - research. Heres the deal, The MR78..because it has no remote or presets or precise freq. display, lost ground to the yamaha. If both were strictly manual tune, I'd give it to the MR78, not to mention it's beautiful looks. But thats my reasoning. As for DX signals, theres never been any weakest of weak signal on the MR78 that I couldnt also get on the TX1000, and vice-versa. They are that closely matched. I will conceed that perhaps "One Of The Best....." would have been a better subject header.. and I was considering it, but ... eh'... I will next time. I do appreciate the feedback. Hope readers enjoy the photo. I have a great time with both receivers and that classic rotor setup. rick Thanks for the reply, Richard. It is good to see that there are actually living eBay people advertising on this NG, instead of just spammers. I do respect you greatly for that! Anyway, my point was the "best" characteristic that you applied to the TX1000. That tuner is a very musical tuner, more musical sounding than the MR78, as they come out of the box. Where the MR78 excels is in its RF handling characteristics (IM rejection and adjacent channel selectivity). Out of my tuner collection, the best sounding units are my Luxman T-88V, T-110, Parasound TDQ-150, followed by my MR78 ( I did redesign the multiplex decoder in the MR78, using a Philips TDA1591 decoder chip. The stereo separation over most of the audio band is now 55dB, but now it sounds like a Magnum Dynalab MD102. Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggggg!) I think my worst sounding tuner is my Cambridge Audio T-500. Super AM section, but hard, steely sound. My main stereo system consists of a Marshall Leach LNF-1A power amp, with a Leach preamp. Good soft, mellow sound with everything except that T-500 tuner. Anyway, once again, thanks for the reply. I wish you the best on your auction! Pete |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA - McKay Dymek AM5 Tuner, rare & mint....... AM-BCB-DX | Shortwave | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
AM Tube Tuner Kit -- candidate models from yesteryear? | Shortwave | |||
FA:Heathkit SA-2500 Auto Antenna Tuner - RARE | Swap | |||
FA: Heathkit SA-2500 Auto Antenna Tuner - RARE | Swap |