Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to install a Motorola (NMO) VHF hole mount in my car's trunk
lid. Like most late model vehicles however, it is made entirely of aluminum. If your familiar with it, you know the mount fitting is machined of brass. I've done a few of these on traditional sheet steel trunks without thinking about this before, and never had a problem with premature failure from galvanic type corrosion. Besides electrical/RF degradation, I am equally concerned about the integrity of the vehicle finish in the event of catastrophic corrosion. I intend to run about 50w to this antenna. My question is: If my installation is as waterproof as they always have been, should I be more concerned about this phenomena while dealing with brass and aluminum than I was with brass and steel? I have found a lot of talent in this group. Thanx in advance for your well-considered opinions. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Oct 2005 17:11:43 -0700, "Nick" wrote:
I want to install a Motorola (NMO) VHF hole mount in my car's trunk lid. Like most late model vehicles however, it is made entirely of aluminum. If your familiar with it, you know the mount fitting is machined of brass. I've done a few of these on traditional sheet steel trunks without thinking about this before, and never had a problem with premature failure from galvanic type corrosion. Besides electrical/RF degradation, I am equally concerned about the integrity of the vehicle finish in the event of catastrophic corrosion. I intend to run about 50w to this antenna. My question is: If my installation is as waterproof as they always have been, should I be more concerned about this phenomena while dealing with brass and aluminum than I was with brass and steel? I have found a lot of talent in this group. Thanx in advance for your well-considered opinions. Aluminum is less noble than brass, therefore there will be slightly more galvanic action with your new installation. Use an anti-oxidant paste to slow down or eliminate the corrosion. Products such as Noalox or Penetrox. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick wrote:
I want to install a Motorola (NMO) VHF hole mount in my car's trunk lid. Like most late model vehicles however, it is made entirely of aluminum. If your familiar with it, you know the mount fitting is machined of brass. I've done a few of these on traditional sheet steel trunks without thinking about this before, and never had a problem with premature failure from galvanic type corrosion. Besides electrical/RF degradation, I am equally concerned about the integrity of the vehicle finish in the event of catastrophic corrosion. I intend to run about 50w to this antenna. My question is: If my installation is as waterproof as they always have been, should I be more concerned about this phenomena while dealing with brass and aluminum than I was with brass and steel? I have found a lot of talent in this group. Thanx in advance for your well-considered opinions. The threaded brass outer ring has (or should have) and O-ring embedded in the bottom edge to provide weather proofing. I would not be concerned with this setup. While I cannot recall ever installing an NMO on an aluminum auto body, I have used an NMO on a variety of other outside antenna installations with aluminum and have never experienced an problem. Andy |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Nick wrote: I want to install a Motorola (NMO) VHF hole mount in my car's trunk lid. Like most late model vehicles however, it is made entirely of aluminum. If your familiar with it, you know the mount fitting is machined of brass. I've done a few of these on traditional sheet steel trunks without thinking about this before, and never had a problem with premature failure from galvanic type corrosion. Besides electrical/RF degradation, I am equally concerned about the integrity of the vehicle finish in the event of catastrophic corrosion. I intend to run about 50w to this antenna. My question is: If my installation is as waterproof as they always have been, should I be more concerned about this phenomena while dealing with brass and aluminum than I was with brass and steel? I have found a lot of talent in this group. Thanx in advance for your well-considered opinions. I am not at all familiar with the electrical requirements of your specific mobile antenna and so my first counter-question is whether the instructions require electrical contact between the conductive brass of the antenna and the conductive aluminum of the trunk. If conductivity is important, you may be able to reduce dissimilar metal electrochemical degredation by 'painting' a narrow seal 'bead' with something like that transparent Krylon spray (others here might have better material suggestions). If conductivity is not required, then a thin sheet (or ring) of parafilm, or other soft deformable but insulating and waterproof material (even waxpaper, saranwrap), carefully cut, might 'fill' surfaces so well as to exclude moisture that promotes electrochemical processes. Do they give you, for example, a rubber washer for use on the inside side of the trunk sheet? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antennas, metal objects and HF reception | Shortwave | |||
Using a metal roof as a ground plane | Antenna | |||
a dipole made of two great sheets of metal? | Antenna | |||
Loop antenna question | Shortwave | |||
Free for postage: Three metal tubes,5T4, 6SR7, 6J5 | Swap |