Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 May 2006 20:29:28 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote: Roger wrote: There are few people who can type that fast. However on CW you type your response while listening to the other station so the transmission speed can be well above your typing speed. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of people I've met in school and industry who could even approach that 100 wpm. The old electric portables used to jam the keys at much over 60 while the "selectric" could go a fair amount faster. When in college my daughter wore out one of those and she could out type it. My father was NY state champ at over 100 wpm on a manual typewriter in about 1940. I always figured Bucky the milkman must have been my real father, since I was at 15 wpm before typing class, and 12 after a year of it. I still type with 4 fingers, and have to use my eyes to figure where they should go. And I have typed for a living for the last 30+ years. ![]() If I have to look at the keyboard I'm in trouble. My fingers know where the keys are, but I don't. :-)) If I'm on the telephone and taking notes it'd be faster to use a pencil. OTOH I can at least read my typing. I was net control for a weather watch net with tornado warnings out all around us (Lower Michigan). When I did the summary after the net I realized I need a head set with VOX built in so I can have both hands free. When I was a kid I bought a typing book, borrowed an old mechanical type writer and taught myself. It really didn't take all that long. I'd guess It took about the same time to get to 60 WPM on a mill as it did 20 on a key. My wife remarked that having worked in clerical and administration for the state she knew a number of people who could type 100 WPM. I asked if that was mistake free as corrections take time. It turned out they were considerably slower when mistakes were taken into account. OTOH when I was a sysadmin for a large corporation one of the system admins could type so fast the keyboard buzzed. You could watch the characters flow across the screen and in both directions. If he made a mistake it might take him two words to recognize it, go back and retype. I think he still was making over 100 WPM. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com tom K0TAR |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger wrote:
I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of people I've met in school and industry who could even approach that 100 wpm. The old electric portables used to jam the keys at much over 60 while the "selectric" could go a fair amount faster. When in college my daughter wore out one of those and she could out type it. My wife and son can both type, error free at about that rate. I took a typing course in the summer when I was in high school and passed the 10wpm error free test. I think in my case it was 10wpm and at least one word error free :-) My first wife's sister was able to type faster than an IBM selectric typewriter (165wpm) error free. She won awards and contests for it. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger is posting again. Will the same person who told him to stop posting last time kindly tell him to stop posting again. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stop posting to our group Roger.
|
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven wrote: We really mean it this time. good luck |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not the one who needs luck.
|
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven wrote: I'm not the one who needs luck. yes you are not flaming you but Roger has resited years of concerted attacks by those he has abused in RRAP and other places I wish you luck and most of all success |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since I'm only here via crossposting, and not in your groups but for
the surrepitious route, I will survive. The other tomcat in my neighborhood doesn't look like he will though... |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger wrote: On 21 May 2006 23:36:10 -0700, wrote: dang ugly... Slopsville. The keyboards could kick back and type about any CW speed with perfect sending. A decent typist can go over 100 wpm+. There are few people who can type that fast. However on CW you type your response while listening to the other station so the transmission speed can be well above your typing speed. Heck, my mother who was a legal secretary could go well over 100 wpm. On the old selectrics, I think she probably did 120-140+ wpm. She made very few mistakes too. About like a typing machine.. I don't like responding while the other person is sending. At 55-60 wpm, it could lead to some mistakes in copy.. :/ I do that on RTTY, PSK31, but not CW. When I worked faster CW, I listened mostly in my head, and only wrote down the important stuff like call, name.. But I sent normally using a bencher paddle. I don't really use it like a squeeze keyer either. More like an automatic bug. I side slap and rarely use the squeeze method to make letters. I'm still using the same bencher I have had for at least 20+ years.. Guess I'm getting my moneys worth.. I have a homebrew keyer that was built at the same time, and it still works too.. ![]() MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|