Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"R.F. Burns" wrote in news:bXxdg.7450$8G3.2005
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: www.hamwave.com only charges $100 per YEAR for you banner ad. Which amounts to about $10 per potential viewer...... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Naw...don't worry about that. But if I were an advertiser, I'd be pretty
mad. They're probably shelling out upwards of $500 per MONTH on eHam. "Diamond Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 26 May 2006 07:16:23 GMT, "R.F. Burns" wrote: www.hamwave.org only charges $100 per YEAR for you banner ad. I wonder if we are seeing the reason that the eham.com site was knocked offline. Maybe hamwave has a hacker on the job, they surely appear to have an interest in the demise of eham.com. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not my sight, I just happened to run across it.
"Diamond Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:35:25 GMT, "R.F. Burns" wrote: Naw...don't worry about that. But if I were an advertiser, I'd be pretty mad. They're probably shelling out upwards of $500 per MONTH on eHam. If they are, they are probably getting their money's worth and eham will probably take care of them once the problems are fixed. It's traffic that matters and from what I saw of your site there's no reason for it to be heavily trafficed. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sight is what you don't have if you think the site you mentioned compares to
eham.net in any way. "R.F. Burns" wrote in message ... It's not my sight, I just happened to run across it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what's up with eham? | Homebrew | |||
eham down? | Shortwave | |||
eham down? | Shortwave | |||
IBOC Article | Shortwave | |||
eHam...GEEZ! | Swap |