Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
clfe wrote:
Not really, but I'm not in a mood to argue about stupid **** - anymore. Actually, I could care less. My ham days are few and far in between due to all the ass holes on there ruining it for the rest of us. Maybe you're right.......... the code really didn't keep the crud off the radios. Hell, why even have a test at all. Time to hang up your ticket I guess. We are all assholes, and you are the only "true ham radio operator" left. Go play with yourself. tom K0TAR |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
clfe wrote:
Not really, but I'm not in a mood to argue about stupid **** - anymore. Actually, I could care less. My ham days are few and far in between due to all the ass holes on there ruining it for the rest of us. Maybe you're right.......... the code really didn't keep the crud off the radios. Hell, why even have a test at all. And at least we admit who we are. You, on the other hand, are hiding. You are likely just a frigging troll that isn't even licensed. tom K0TAR |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Give up CB for Ham.....what the hell would you be giving up?
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:36:21 -0400, "clfe" wrote: I am of the opinion that a 5 WPM at least - should be kept on as a requirement - as someday - it may be needed. Think not? Say you're in the midst of an attack - of terrorism, a war on our homefront OR a large scale natural disaster, a microphone isn't working or available. You can key the radio but don't know code - now what? With code, even at 5 WPM - you could get some very important information to those needing it to help save you - to them. You could tell them WITH code, what is needed, exact whereabouts, how many people involved, etc........ Just clicking a mic pin with a wire won't tell anyone anything and could delay any help or a response big enough to do much good. In these times with the large scale disasters as we've seen and attacks - even for any said to be planned, NOW is a good time to WANT to know code. IT may save you........ It is one of those skills you learn - just like CPR or whatever - you hope you never have to use, but you're glad you have it - when you need it. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** Your priorities are skewed. Since there are only so many hours allotted to us, what would be a better way to spend your spare time: 1. Learning morse code for the above mike-failure scenario? 2. Stocking up food, water and ammo for the above mike-failure scenario? You have been reading too many stories of the valiant radio op on the Titanic. Ain't gonna happen. Bill, W6WRT 20 wpm Extra, but realistic about it |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Ring" wrote in message
.. . clfe wrote: Not really, but I'm not in a mood to argue about stupid **** - anymore. Actually, I could care less. My ham days are few and far in between due to all the ass holes on there ruining it for the rest of us. Maybe you're right.......... the code really didn't keep the crud off the radios. Hell, why even have a test at all. Time to hang up your ticket I guess. We are all assholes, and you are the only "true ham radio operator" left. Go play with yourself. tom K0TAR Nah, not all of "us" or "you" in the case of your statement. I'm just saying a lot of crap is going on - on the bands today and its not worth even earning a ticket for - anymore. Ham radio and yes, even CB - used to be respectable at one time. How times change. Its hardly worth turning on the radio anymore. Especially on say 10 and 80 meters. But back to "your" statement, there are still "many" decent operators on both the Ham AND CB bands - out there. Ya just got to pick through the rubble to find them sometimes. And NO, I"m not the "ONLY" "TRUE" Operator left........ Don't put words in my mouth, I certainly didn't place myself on any pedestal. Again - there are LOTS of decent operators out there. I didn't say "ALL" were bad - but there are - you have to admit - quite a few bad ones. Its gotten worse in the past few years. |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Ring" wrote in message
.. . clfe wrote: Not really, but I'm not in a mood to argue about stupid **** - anymore. Actually, I could care less. My ham days are few and far in between due to all the ass holes on there ruining it for the rest of us. Maybe you're right.......... the code really didn't keep the crud off the radios. Hell, why even have a test at all. And at least we admit who we are. You, on the other hand, are hiding. You are likely just a frigging troll that isn't even licensed. tom K0TAR I don't sign with my call. Some like to - that is their choice. But even if they didn't - wouldn't give me any reason to doubt them being licensed. "Posting" a call sign doesn't prove a thing. "I" for one - am NOT going to go running to the FCC database to check your call or any other to see if it is legit. I don't care........ |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in oups.com: Alot of people are telling me that CB is just for inbred hicks and that I should replace the CB in my truck with a ham radio. What do you thjink? Which of your trucks were you thinking of updating? Your old rust bucket truck that still runs, or the one on blocks that you call your base station? sc Nice predjudice against a guy without knowing him. Somehow did an optic nerve get crossed with your asshole giving you a crappy view of life? |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() clfe wrote: "Tom Ring" wrote in message .. . clfe wrote: And at least we admit who we are. You, on the other hand, are hiding. You are likely just a frigging troll that isn't even licensed. tom K0TAR I don't sign with my call. Some like to - that is their choice. But even if they didn't - wouldn't give me any reason to doubt them being licensed. "Posting" a call sign doesn't prove a thing. "I" for one - am NOT going to go running to the FCC database to check your call or any other to see if it is legit. I don't care........ OTOH there are those that do indeed run the database everytie they see a call Robeson (k4yz) is one and a real ass about ti too |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billy Smith wrote in
k.net: Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: Alot of people are telling me that CB is just for inbred hicks and that I should replace the CB in my truck with a ham radio. What do you thjink? Which of your trucks were you thinking of updating? Your old rust bucket truck that still runs, or the one on blocks that you call your base station? sc Nice predjudice against a guy without knowing him. Somehow did an optic nerve get crossed with your asshole giving you a crappy view of life? Thanks for the diagnosis Doc, I wondered what was wrong. So did you finally decide to give up CB for ham? sc |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I was going through about ten years of ham catalogs, and I noticed a disturbing trend. | Antenna | |||
I was going through about ten years of ham catalogs, and I noticed a disturbing trend. | Equipment |