Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#211
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:05:40 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message t... Al Klein wrote: I'll bet he didn't derive the shapes of the written numbers from first principles either. That fact goes against your "memorizing is evil" argument. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp There's a difference between memorizing a formula or method and memorizing specific answers to specific questions. The former is called learning, and can be applied to many situations. The latter is called laziness, and teaches nothing that can be used for any other purpose. You must be at least 6 years old, Brenda Ann - Cecil can't seem to make that distinction. ![]() |
#212
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ham radio is gonna be flushed big time if this is all you old farts are
worried about. |
#213
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brenda Ann wrote:
There's a difference between memorizing a formula or method and memorizing specific answers to specific questions. The former is called learning, and can be applied to many situations. The latter is called laziness, and teaches nothing that can be used for any other purpose. That is just hair-splitting. For instance, the first question in my 2000 Extra Class License Manual is: What exclusive frequency privileges in the 80-meter band are authorized to Extra class control operators? Of the four choices, the correct answer is 3500-3525 kHz. Now what formula or method will yield the correct answer? I simply memorized that specific answer to that specific question. The moral is: "Work smarter, not harder!" -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#214
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Klein wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Showing that you DON'T know the difference. I personally don't care why the unit of resistance is named the ohm. Which has nothing to do with the discussion. I do know the difference but the point is that I do not *need* to know the history behind that particular choice. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#215
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Klein wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:18:17 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: One doesn't, but "first principles" has nothing to do with this discussion - a fact you still don't understand. There's two ways to learn: 1. Memorize knowledge, 2. develop knowledge from first principles. Which has nothing to do with the difference between memorizing answers and learning theory. If you are learning theory that someone has already developed, you *are* memorizing answers. I *memorized* Ohm's law for my Novice exam. I *memorized* the fact that 'I' is the letter used for current. If you are not memorizing answers provided by the people who developed the theory, then you are necessarily developing the theory from first principles. Avoiding memorizing answers to questions is a good way to keep making the same mistakes over and over. Do you avoid the Q&A sections of all web pages for fear that you might accidentally memorize an answer? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#216
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
... "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Al Klein wrote: I'll bet he didn't derive the shapes of the written numbers from first principles either. That fact goes against your "memorizing is evil" argument. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp There's a difference between memorizing a formula or method and memorizing specific answers to specific questions. The former is called learning, and can be applied to many situations. The latter is called laziness, and teaches nothing that can be used for any other purpose. -- Say no to institutionalized interference. Just say NO to HD/IBOC! Which is exactly what "I" also have said. They're splitting hairs over the definition. MANY words can be used in more than one way. Your example is resembling mine. There are some things (many actually) you must "memorize" (learn) for life - to function. To simply "memorize" answers for a test - as you said, teaches NOTHING. It doens't even guarantee passing. I've seen a few fail by that method. IT simply is NOT a good way to go about things in life. Laziness gets you no where - fast. L. |
#217
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Klein wrote:
wrote: There's a difference between memorizing a formula or method and memorizing specific answers to specific questions. The former is called learning, and can be applied to many situations. The latter is called laziness, and teaches nothing that can be used for any other purpose. You must be at least 6 years old, Brenda Ann - Cecil can't seem to make that distinction. ![]() So exactly what is the "formula or method" for determining Extra frequency privileges outside of memorizing them? I was too lazy to use a formula so I just memorized only what I needed to know for my Extra exam. I still don't know all the Extra frequencies for all the bands. Since Extras have all frequency privileges, I don't really need to know where those frequencies are. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#218
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
m... Brenda Ann wrote: There's a difference between memorizing a formula or method and memorizing specific answers to specific questions. The former is called learning, and can be applied to many situations. The latter is called laziness, and teaches nothing that can be used for any other purpose. That is just hair-splitting. For instance, the first question in my 2000 Extra Class License Manual is: What exclusive frequency privileges in the 80-meter band are authorized to Extra class control operators? Of the four choices, the correct answer is 3500-3525 kHz. Now what formula or method will yield the correct answer? I simply memorized that specific answer to that specific question. The moral is: "Work smarter, not harder!" -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp In the example YOU give - Cecil - it could be taken either way. In the case of the "frequencies" you're to operate on for a given license and band - YES - you could simply "memorize" (not really commit to memory) those frequencies - for the exam purposes and just refer to a chart from there in. OR you COULD "memorize" them (actually committing to memory) for the purpose of NOT having to use a chart! However, once you use those frequencies after a while - especially if active - then you "would" tend to "memorize" (for life) those frequencies. Yes, it is definately splitting hairs! L. |
#219
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
L. wrote:
Laziness gets you no where - fast. Laziness allows one to achieve a goal by the most efficient route. Some famous German military leader said he would lots rather have brilliant and lazy officers than ambitious and stupid ones. I personally would rather see brilliant and lazy amateur radio operators than ambitious and stupid ones hanging on for dear life to an obsolete testing requirement. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#220
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
L. wrote:
YES - you could simply "memorize" (not really commit to memory) Here's the crux of your communications problem. From Webster's: "memorize - to commit to memory". *Everything* that one memorizes is the act of committing something to memory. You definitely need to pick a different word than "memorize" to describe the concept you are trying to present. Memorizing is how human beings remember things and it is a good thing. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave |