Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#521
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rom: an old friend on Fri, Sep 1 2006 7:30 pm
Slow Code wrote: wrote in : You might have gotten some priviledges, but that was only because ham radio has been dumbed down and you didn't have to make an effort to earn them. funy how for all you claim to be better than I and better than those that agree with me on code tesing Our view is going to prevail trolling right along Mark, you have to give up on this anonymous "Slow Code." He is just another of the Bigot Morsemen. He cannot adjust to changing times, changing technology, or (perhaps) changing his underwear. The FCC establishes regulations for ALL United States civil radio. What the FCC says, goes. The ARRL doesn't rule, morsemen don't rule, and old, old traditions don't rule. The FCC has NEVER said anything about "earning" a license...a license applicant must take an FCC-approved test and score above an FCC-established minimum percentage correct answers. That's all there is. FCC regulations are LAW and that LAW can be changed by democratic principled means. That LAW is not established by some minority group who cannot advance beyond primitive on-off carrier keying. This "Slow Code" (like all bigoted morsemen) has taken up a role of "I-am-your-leader" gang-banger bull**** bragging and usual calling names of those licensees "below" him. Poor guy (or gal?). That's all this "Slow Code" has...SOME manual morse code skill. He might be right at home in an 1870s telegraph office but his attitude is neither for democratic principles, nor for good fellowship in a hobby, nor as a human being participating in a discussion forum. The FCC doesn't "rule" on any amateur radio "traditions." It simply regulates ALL US civil radio (amateur radio is a small part of that) and mitigates interference when it happens. The FCC follows the LAW in their charter, permitting an open forum for Comments on NPRMs, even R&Os, open for ALL citizens and even allowing Comments from non-citizens. Bigot morsemen do NOT allow any opinions opposing their own over-inflated self-defined opinions. They want to RULE all the Homies in da Ham Hood. They think they "own" ham radio when the only thing they've "earned" is a bad attitude against them. It's a wonder they haven't taken up Spark transmitters (even though damped-wave mode is forbidden by law). Spark and morsemanship went together in olden days, days well before the existance of any of the bigot morsemen in this forum. "Slow Code" needs a time machine to go back to that old era since he can't keep up with modern times nor the democratic principles of the representative republic of the United States of America. As a professional in radio communications, one who began in and on HF over a half century ago, I have contempt for the over-inflated egos of the bigot morsemen. None have made their case valid enough to warrant morse code testing for amateur radio licenses forever. But, the ARRL is toadying to them, vainly hoping to increase their minority membership by sticking to the amateur practice of a half century ago. ARRL membership hasn't increased beyond a quarter of all licensed radio amateurs in the United States, nor has the ARRL favored, ever, the VHF-and-up amateur radio licensees beyond the barest minimum of mentions. Sooner or later the FCC will yield to PUBLIC pressure to modernize US amateur radio beyond the old-fashioned limitations and favoritism towards morsemanship lobbied for by the ARRL. It may not come in "Slow Code's" lifetime since he is of the group where a morse key has to be pried from his cold, dead fingers. Poor "Slow Code," old before his time, unable to fit into this new millennium of radio technology. |
#522
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We are better than you! Was there ever any doubt? If you can't learn code
you are not only stupid but lazy as well! You have a welfare license, shut up and enjoy what was given to your whining ass... "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... Slow Code wrote: wrote in : You might have gotten some priviledges, but that was only because ham radio has been dumbed down and you didn't have to make an effort to earn them. funy how for all you claim to be better than I and better than those that agree with me on code tesing Our view is going to prevail trolling right along |
#523
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred Hambrecht wrote: We are better than you! Was there ever any doubt? If you can't learn code you are not only stupid but lazy as well! You have a welfare license, shut up and enjoy what was given to your whining ass... Mr Congenialty has spoken. |
#524
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Fred Hambrecht on Sat, Sep 2 2006 1:52 pm
We are better than you! Was there ever any doubt? If you can't learn code you are not only stupid but lazy as well! You have a welfare license, shut up and enjoy what was given to your whining ass... "an old friend" wrote in message Slow Code wrote: wrote in : You might have gotten some priviledges, but that was only because ham radio has been dumbed down and you didn't have to make an effort to earn them. funy how for all you claim to be better than I and better than those that agree with me on code tesing Our view is going to prevail trolling right along Go for it, Congenial Fred, show 'em who's boss in da ham hood! :-) Ya know, US amateur radio is supposed to be about good fellowship and all that warm and fuzzy stuff. Poor Fred long since ran out of warmth and his mind is fuzzy...tsk. What are YOU "better at," Congenial Fred? Morse code? I'm sure you are a whiz at that. Anything else except getting a bad score on the range after shooting off your mouth? I'll bet not. Wow (yawn) 50 years a ham (and still not cured). I've been a professional in radio longer than that. Fascinating stuff that radio and electronics technology. Morse code isn't technology per se...it was being done over 40 years before the first radio-as-a-communications-medium was demonstrated in 1896. But you "are better" than non-morsemen because you passed a NON-TECHNICAL, NON-INTELLECTUAL manual morse code test...as an AMATEUR. [big Ben Stein "wowwww" here] "Welfare license?" Just because there's no manual morse code test for Technician class? Oh, my, but the FCC does NOT say anything about "welfare licenses." That's only your own BIGOTRY vomited up. Almost half of all US amateur radio licenses are now in the Technician Class. Are you deliberately trying to alienate half of all ham licensees? Well, Congenial Fred, you are doing real good on that alienation part. Have fun on "the bands," Fred, there's plenty of your kind there, the bigoted morsemen, the self-proclaimed gods of AMATEUR radio trying to be "leaders" in da ham 'hood. Fred, support stem cell research. You've lost too many neurons required for good fellowship...maybe some stem cells can help restore them. |
#525
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on Sat, Sep 2 2006 3:43 pm
Fred Hambrecht wrote: We are better than you! Was there ever any doubt? If you can't learn code you are not only stupid but lazy as well! You have a welfare license, shut up and enjoy what was given to your whining ass... Mr Congenialty has spoken. Brian, sudden realization! We may have found the illegitimate biological father of Stebie Robeson! Same ego, same "better than you" bad attitude, same lack of good fellowship, same 9-year-old's sass, same-o same-o! Incredible! Then again he may be a cousin to that anony-mousie "Slow Code." Lots of inbreeding going on in the morsemen ranks. I wonder where Jimmy Noserve is hiding? Fred said "shut up!" Jimmy would have a hissy fit if'n he saw that...:-) |
#526
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"an old friend" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: wrote in : You might have gotten some priviledges, but that was only because ham radio has been dumbed down and you didn't have to make an effort to earn them. funy how for all you claim to be better than I and better than those that agree with me on code tesing Our view is going to prevail Right, **** rolls down hill. SC |
#527
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I extend fellowship to REAL hams, you no code idiots are not hams, simply
CBers that have the ability to read at a third grade level. Everyone serves a purpose, even if only as a bad example... No code, non showering, non intellectial, whiners holding welfare licenses meet that criteria to a "T". Now that you have been responded to in the manner you accuse all code able hams of, you may cease your trolling... I don't really give a flip one way or another if you ever know code, I just wish the bunch of you would stop playing "pity me" and lamenting the fact you do not have a no code Jesse Jackson type to take up your cause. You have a license, enjoy it and if you don't care to learn the code, someday you won't have to. In the mean time shut up with the whining and get on with life. The license is only worth the investment you have in it, no effort - no value! If you spent half the time learning as you do bitching you would be at 40 WPM. wrote in message oups.com... From: Fred Hambrecht on Sat, Sep 2 2006 1:52 pm We are better than you! Was there ever any doubt? If you can't learn code you are not only stupid but lazy as well! You have a welfare license, shut up and enjoy what was given to your whining ass... "an old friend" wrote in message Go for it, Congenial Fred, show 'em who's boss in da ham hood! :-) Ya know, US amateur radio is supposed to be about good fellowship and all that warm and fuzzy stuff. Poor Fred long since ran out of warmth and his mind is fuzzy...tsk. What are YOU "better at," Congenial Fred? Morse code? I'm sure you are a whiz at that. Anything else except getting a bad score on the range after shooting off your mouth? I'll bet not. Wow (yawn) 50 years a ham (and still not cured). I've been a professional in radio longer than that. Fascinating stuff that radio and electronics technology. Morse code isn't technology per se...it was being done over 40 years before the first radio-as-a-communications-medium was demonstrated in 1896. But you "are better" than non-morsemen because you passed a NON-TECHNICAL, NON-INTELLECTUAL manual morse code test...as an AMATEUR. [big Ben Stein "wowwww" here] "Welfare license?" Just because there's no manual morse code test for Technician class? Oh, my, but the FCC does NOT say anything about "welfare licenses." That's only your own BIGOTRY vomited up. Almost half of all US amateur radio licenses are now in the Technician Class. Are you deliberately trying to alienate half of all ham licensees? Well, Congenial Fred, you are doing real good on that alienation part. Have fun on "the bands," Fred, there's plenty of your kind there, the bigoted morsemen, the self-proclaimed gods of AMATEUR radio trying to be "leaders" in da ham 'hood. Fred, support stem cell research. You've lost too many neurons required for good fellowship...maybe some stem cells can help restore them. |
#528
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred Hambrecht wrote: I extend fellowship to REAL hams, you no code idiots are not hams, bull**** |
#529
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred Hambrecht wrote: I extend fellowship to REAL hams, you no code idiots are not hams, bull**** |
#530
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you read beyond that line, you would have seen I was fulfilling the
expectations of the no code troll... "an old friend" wrote in message ps.com... Fred Hambrecht wrote: I extend fellowship to REAL hams, you no code idiots are not hams, bull**** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave |